employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

NeuroLeadership Institute

Is this your company?

NeuroLeadership Institute Reviews

2.9

36% would recommend to a friend

(173 total reviews)
avatar

David Rock

41% approve of CEO

32% positive business outlook

NeuroLeadership Institute has an employee rating of 2.9 out of 5 stars, based on 173 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The NeuroLeadership Institute employee rating is 22% below average for employers within the Management and consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

173 reviews
1.0
9 Dec 2017

Disappointing experience, no leadership

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

They have some amazing, warm, kind and talented people working in this company, and sadly none of them are in management. The principles of neuroleadership, SCARF, brain-based coaching, feedback and improving diversity are inspiring. Casual dress code.

Cons

I agree with other reviewers - the management do not follow any of their own advice on leadership or management. They actually all do the complete opposite. David teaches that employees in a "threat state" do not work as efficiently and are unable to be creative, but then he creates a maximum "threat state" culture in his own business. NLI employees are constantly in a high-threat state. This is mostly due to extreme control and micromanagement of every single task performed. The management do not trust their staff to perform their jobs, despite an overly-rigorous interview and hiring process. They seem to think that more complex tests at the interview stage will provide better staff and fix the turnover/ dissatisfaction levels. However most of these tests are useless. Job applicants who are patient enough to complete the crazy NLI tests, get amazing results, get hired, are then ignored and subjugated when they try to speak up to help solve some of the fundamental business and operational issues. Other cons include lack of processes (especially HR), systems, poor communications, passive-aggressive management style, no clear global strategic direction as a business, and little or no career progression opportunities. Lastly, the "flexible working/ work-life-balance" is usually a competition to see who can respond to emails or chats at 10pm at night, or 4pm on a Sunday. Real work-life balance should not just be about working-from-home 24/7. It is about shutting down and giving your brain a break, so you are not exhausted all the time, and can function at the higher level when you really need to.

2.0
11 June 2019

Not a place to work if you want to make a difference... yet

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

People in the APAC Office are amazing for the most part. Really authentic, genuine and hard working people who really do want to make workplaces and employees' lives better. Fantastic set of clients to work with - people who are really keen on transforming their organisations. Really good exposure and experience to the modern challenges of learning in large organisations, particularly Australian Government and also organisations in Asia. Anyone below the NYC Leadership Team is pretty decent - happy to help you out and provide good outcomes for clients. Excellent set of Education Programs that they might put you on. Superlative resources and perspectives on addressing workplace learning and effectiveness challenges of today. Very good facilitators who make what can be challenging content extremely addressable and useful.

Cons

CEO + Leadership Team in New York City are some sort of cult - no one ever knows what they are thinking or planning. Every now and then they'll release something but it'll just be words and never actions. COO is a control freak with zero regard for anyone outside of the USA. If you don't work in NYC, you pretty much better not have an opinion or ask questions - just try to do your best from the patchwork of scant 'strategy' they provide. From the top down there is absolutely no internalising of everything they preach on providing clarity, being inclusive, asking for feedback etc.

avatar
NeuroLeadership Institute Response
7y
I’m truly sorry for your experience working with us. All of us- wherever we are- make a tremendous effort to be as communicative and inclusive as possible. We’ve recently hired two senior-level managers in APAC who we expect will further connect- and make more understandable- the APAC region to our North American entity. The past few years have been about building tools to enable individuals and teams and the organization, overall, to succeed. As part of operating as a global company, there are some standardized process and policies that guide how we work, and there will continue to be (as is the norm.) We will continue to improve and evolve in part thanks to a strongly engaged and committed workforce. Wishing you the best in your future endeavors.
2.0
18 July 2022

Employees are not their priority, contrary to what they preach

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Hires some lovely and skilled people - Branding look is clean and ties everything together - Flexible working with fully-remote options to work away from your home city

Cons

- Material presented had been churned through a lot of "dumbing down" to hide the outdated research basis - Creative and project team that is not based in the US barely have influence on bad design of some products - They will just get rid of their employees to save money without much thought on proper outplacement process or any other support. They just tell them they are being let go and then remove all acess the next day even if that employee has provided many years and clients to the company. Whether it's legal or not, the way they make people redundant is not at all moral or considerate. It was even a pain to return equipment. - No proper onboarding, you fend for yourself. You are lucky of you have helpful and nice colleagues, but if you end up in a busier team, forget proper support. - No proper HR team, hence the heartless treatment of employees. - There are employees that claim they have a certain credential but are not at all certified (eg. say they are psychologists but are not AHPRA registered).

Viewing 1 - 3 of 173 Reviews

Glassdoor has 186 NeuroLeadership Institute reviews submitted anonymously by NeuroLeadership Institute employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if NeuroLeadership Institute is right for you.