employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Pacific Community Ventures

Is this your company?

Pacific Community Ventures Reviews

2.8

30% would recommend to a friend

(24 total reviews)

32% positive business outlook

Pacific Community Ventures has an employee rating of 2.8 out of 5 stars, based on 24 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Pacific Community Ventures employee rating is 25% below average for employers within the Non-profit and NGO industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

24 reviews
1.0
11 Mar 2022

Leave PCV Alone

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Get to work with many great people Solid Benefits

Cons

Please read below if: You are considering working for PCV because of its stated commitment to DEI and BIPOC Communities or Want to understand the culture and turnover at PCV; On the surface, PCV seems like a wonderful place to work for those who care about advancing DEI and BIPOC entrepreneurship. And in fairness to most of my current and former coworkers, they are in fact about this mission. So when you have resignations just about every month from multiple analysts, associates, managers, associate directors, directors and C-level team members across the majority of PCV teams over the past year and a half, including a few recent hires who were only with the organization for a few months, that should tell you something isn’t right. When speaking to us about the turnover at staff meetings, our CEO repeatedly attributes it to organizational restructuring and individual non-alignment with her DEI agenda. Beyond the fact the latter is a dishonest insinuation against the character of former employees who are, thus, not able to defend themselves, this explanation falls flat. This is because the recent turnover includes individuals who had strong DEI track records and were hired to advance her restructuring efforts. The problem at PCV is our CEO. Many of us consider her to be narcissistic, insecure and vindictive. I can imagine that this is the result of a few things. First, any form of disagreement being taken personally-making collaboration, a stated PCV value, non-existent. Second, she makes every conversation about her, driving many into silence when talking about the negative impacts of her decisions on their work flows and work life balance. Third, she is not self-aware nor self-accountable.However, she is quick to hold everyone else accountable for her failings-including compelled engagement in professional development workshops that are only needed for her. Fourth, she is abusive and comes across as a bully in the way she talks to people, having made multiple current and former coworkers cry in the process. These issues are compounded by her questionable integrity. An example of this can be seen with her withholding information about a potential COVID outbreak for an in person retreat during the Omicron outbreak which many coworkers had expressed concern over. Programmatically, the organization is focused on creating a Good Jobs Innovation Lab to to help early-stage employers better support their employees. Advancing workers rights is a good thing to be sure. However, if the focus is on advancing BIPOC entrepreneurs, and most are solopreneurs as shown by our own and industry based data, then why is this Lab the focus? Staff has been chastised and dressed down in front of their colleagues for asking this question-being told we are too in the weeds. It seems as if we are treating BIPOC entrepreneurs as test subjects and marketing tools for funding purposes . BIPOC communities are repeatedly subjected to this practice-and are sick of this behavior. More importantly, for a company which preaches DEI, this practice is not equitable- Additionally, can an organization really push a Good Jobs agenda like this without taking care of its own employees first? Beyond what I previously shared about the CEO making staff cry, the wages and benefits have been significantly less than industry and Bay Area non-profit standards. Also, when she actively avoids discussing and sharing data with staff about internal salary and wages, it convinces all of us she has something to hide-and we all discuss salary among each other anyway. The information that came out of these conversations led many other former coworkers of mine to leave and many current colleagues to look for better opportunities. There are many great organizations to work for if you care about DEI and BIPOC Entrepreneurship. Due to what comes off as self-serving, rude and poverty pimping behavior by the CEO, PCV is not one of them. Changing that requires the Board to change CEOs.

2.0
8 Oct 2021

Far from walking the talk

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- good networking space with fun interesting people who live the mission - has a reputation in the community - antiracist/dei trainings - flexibility and work life balance

Cons

- not as flat of an organization as claims to be, extremely hierarchical - leadership makes decisions without input from staff and can't take feedback maturely - lack of equity in workload, compensation, and recognition - CEO lacks professionalism

2.0
17 Apr 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The employees are incredibly talented and a pleasure to work with, creating a supportive and collaborative environment—though this is often in contrast to the challenges presented by leadership. The organization offers excellent work-life balance, strong benefits, and a flexible schedule that provides employees with the autonomy to manage their time effectively. The mission to serve BIPOC communities is deeply meaningful, offering a strong sense of purpose and personal fulfillment.

Cons

The CEO presents a significant challenge within the organization, yet the board remains indifferent due to her strong public speaking skills, her ability to generate substantial revenue, and her reputation for fostering external relationships—particularly with BIPOC-led companies. While she is highly respected outside the office, the internal culture is marked by silence and fear of retaliation. Over the past six years, the company has experienced high staff turnover and consistent negative employee reviews that frequently cite the CEO’s leadership. Despite this, the board shows little concern, prioritizing financial performance over employee well-being. Staff are treated as expendable, and the organization is solely driven by the CEO’s vision. Disagreement or failure to align with her directives often results in termination or blatantly targeted retaliation. Although the CEO frequently claims to value team input and encourages open communication, employees who express differing opinions are labeled as passive-aggressive and may face public criticism—even in front of clients. The CEO struggles with multitasking and frequently approves items without thoroughly reviewing them. When issues arise as a result, she often shifts the blame to others, accusing staff of providing inaccurate information rather than taking accountability for her own oversight. This creates a toxic, high-stress environment that leaves many with no choice but to resign. Promotions within the organization often appear to be influenced more by personal relationship with the CEO than by merit or performance. Those who are perceived as close to her or align with her personally are more likely to advance.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 24 Reviews

Glassdoor has 28 Pacific Community Ventures reviews submitted anonymously by Pacific Community Ventures employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Pacific Community Ventures is right for you.