employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Personal Genome Diagnostics

Acquired by Labcorp

Is this your company?

Personal Genome Diagnostics Reviews

3.0

45% would recommend to a friend

(43 total reviews)
avatar

Adam Schechter

Not enough data to show CEO approval

38% positive business outlook

Personal Genome Diagnostics has an employee rating of 3.0 out of 5 stars, based on 43 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Personal Genome Diagnostics employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

43 reviews
2.0
7 July 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

PGDx started out with good intentions but management got too ambitious and unrealistic with goals.

Cons

*Did not have the infrastructure to handle rapid expansion - went on a hiring spree without clear goals. *Upper management throws everyone else under the bus if things don't meet their ridiculous expectations *You are more likely to keep your job or have something meaningful to do only if you worked with upper management people previously like in Roche, Ventana, Abbott

1.0
16 Apr 2018

Do Not Apply. Horrible Work Environment

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

If you can make friends with the ex Roche and Ventana staff. You can do anything you want. You’ll be compensated well, get to go on trips and they might even get you an aparment. Your bonus will be high because you’ve made it to the “in club”

Cons

The “in club” has no idea how to manage an NGS company. Throws money down the toilet and has fun doing it.

1.0
5 Apr 2020

Dysfunctional bureaucracy

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

We get snacks and beer for all employee meetings about once a month. Bagels on Friday every 2 weeks. Everyone gets a standing desk. Free coffee and tea.

Cons

Complexity is king here. Decisions were made on the fly for product design, now they are written in stone even though it is clear they cause more problems than they solve. To fix the problems, you need to go through a very complex change control process and make your case to a "change control board" which is made up of people who have never set foot in the lab and try to explain why you want to make a change. It is usually easier to wrestle with a broken process than to try and fix it. Documents are way too complex, and full of typos. Those typos create impossible situations, which lead to deviations. Names and part numbers frequently get mixed up so that they point to products that do not exist. This caused typos, relabeling events, and general chaos. Our QMS system is broken. It has obsolete documents that are shown as effective, multiple effective document versions, training on new document versions is not automatically assigned, training emails are not sent, so you have to manually check your training every week to stay in compliance. Every time a document overhaul is attempted, things fall through the cracks because no one reviews the documents, and the old documents are not obsoleted. There are too many systems with too much information and none of them talk to each other. Each of these systems are managed by a different person or group, and none of these systems are connected. The result is typos, missing information, and complete disorganization because there is no "gold standard" document or system to refer to. Deviations have been weaponized by the QA department. QA has no subject matter experts and makes no effort to understand our technology. QA is immune to deviations. If operations is deficient in training, they are assigned a deviation. When QA is deficient in training, they are not. QA also changes the definition of deviations, assigns them arbitrarily, and finds new things to make deviations which were not deviations before. Keep in mind the vast majority of these deviations are technicalities which stem from the fact that the documents we use are so complex and practically guarantee deviations. Operations people are not trusted by the company and it causes resentment. Recently, all music was banned in the labs because it was an easy target for why so many deviations were occurring (remember, it is the complexity of the documents and the QMS system that is the real root cause for most deviations). I have never been in a lab where music was not allowed, especially in operations. Keep in mind the deviation rate did not significantly change after music was banned.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 43 Reviews

Glassdoor has 45 Personal Genome Diagnostics reviews submitted anonymously by Personal Genome Diagnostics employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Personal Genome Diagnostics is right for you.