Qvest.US Reviews

4.0

66% would recommend to a friend

(175 total reviews)

Jon Christian

80% approve of CEO

63% positive business outlook

Qvest.US has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 175 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Qvest.US employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management and consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

175 reviews
1.0
20 May 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

OnPrem cares about their image & culture so much that they asked everyone to write a GlassDoor review during an annual event filled with alcohol and unprofessional behavior. Let's get excited about Media and Entertainment & Consulting which is "not for everyone!" Pros first? The happy hours are fun, but remind me of college, and not in a good way. You might get to travel a little. OnPrem spends a lot of money on their annual meeting party. Salary is okay, and I've seen several people promoted during my time. I love my coworkers.

Cons

OnPrem is not a "Best Service, Best Clients, Best People" company. Services are mediocre at best & compete with budget over quality. Clients are frustrating to work with and OnPrem never says no to anything that will make a dime, even if it's the worst project you've ever worked on. The people are cool, but best is a stretch. While you technically work with "Media and Entertainment" companies, your work will typically have nothing to do with that Media or Entertainment. Typically you're dealing with the most unexciting wings of the company, managing assets or data, and fighting with frustrating software. If you're on a problematic project, expect your work life balance to be bad as well. Management pretends to listen, but in terms of substance they only update their message while avoiding addressing the real problems. Leadership has great arguments and responses when complaints are brought up but the core reasons why people are unhappy are never really addressed.

avatar
Qvest.US Response
10y
We on the OnPrem leadership team make a concerted effort to provide all of our team members with the best experience possible. Our focus on media and entertainment clients provides our talent a unique opportunity to work in a transitioning industry. The types of projects we do varies, and we sincerely consider an individual’s career goals and preferences when determining who is best suited for a project. The building of team member experience also includes our significant investment in culture. We are proud of our acknowledgement in this area including winning LA Business Journal’s Top 100 Places to Work in Los Angeles in 2015 and Fortune Magazine’s 2016 Best Workplaces for Recent Graduates. Part of building this culture we desire is through rigorous screening and hiring practices ensuring we engage the very best talent in the industry. The other part of cultivating a thriving environment is in our commitment to provide opportunities for our teams to socialize inside and outside of the workplace. These factors have created a community that we believe is unparalleled in consulting. At the end of the day, we believe it is important for our team members to not only get to know, but respect and like the people they work with. We appreciate that this environment is not for everyone.
2.0
21 May 2019

Recent layoffs of staff in Austin, TX

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The office is being remodeled. The company is committed to hiring new graduates. Excellent consultant company, less an engineering focused company. Still pay their employees regularly.

Cons

Employee churn was always high. Recently the Austin office laid off 10% of its workforce. These were well liked staff members and engineers with three or more years at the company. Once again the culture of fear is palatable. The owning partners said the laid off employees were "under performing". The partners also said it was "resizing". The layoff points to the consistent poor handling of engineering talent by management. Management got greedy and over hired? Yes. Perhaps they took their eye off of filling the work pipeline? Yes. Place the blame on other people? Yes. Consulting companies are notorious for off-shoring engineering work. The partners are former consultants who are repeating the pattern because, like the big consultant firms, they view engineers as disposable.

2.0
17 Oct 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Nearly all of the engineers are motivated, smart, care about learning, hard working, and fun to be around. Engineers work hard to promote best practices despite external limitations, and the engineering activities are educational. Technical interviews are tough and fair. Modern technologies and languages are promoted. The office features a beer-keg, a fridge stocked with drinks, and snacks. Annual bonuses were issued in 2014. Office hours and work from home are typically very flexible. Team structure is mostly flat. The company cares a lot about culture, which means fun and great people. Mixed: The volatile nature of consulting leads to working on many projects, which is educational and stressful. Company growth is mind blowing. Company Kool-Aid is heavily spiked. Hours worked average around 45 for most engineers. Benefits leave much to be desired. The office environment is uncomfortable, so visit it in person.

Cons

At the IDC, you will become an “OpenText Media Manager expert” and tasked with creating plugins, data migrations, installs, upgrade, or customization for this legacy software. Don’t believe the hype around innovation, internal products, or entertainment industry. Projects are as boring as they come. Consulting is a significant part of daily work including estimates, client headaches, meetings, spreadsheets, deadlines, client calls, and more meetings. Some projects feature more consulting tasks than engineering work. Engineering best practices often do not happen because of lack of billable resources, single-engineer projects, non-technical PMs, deadlines, and demanding clients. Stress is a huge problem. Lucky engineers get boring projects. Unlucky engineers are assigned projects that feature excessive meetings, zero influence, unrealistic deadlines, unqualified PMs, frustrating clients, and projects unrelated to their skillset. Many projects have a consultant acting as project managers, and making decisions they’re not qualified to make. Some engineers work 2 to 3 projects at once. A 2-person project was so miserable that 3 engineers quit in less than 6 months. Management pretends to care and hypes change during team-meetings, but never follows through. Engineers have minimal project influence, and estimations are broken. Typically unqualified non-technical consultants, managers, and clients determine project specs and rough estimate without engineers, then demand for rushed estimates and waterfall style project-plans with little notice or information, which later becomes deadlines. Finally, a word of warning about overtime. Only hours billable to a client over a quarter qualify. You will rarely see overtime due to fixed-bid projects, vacations, sick days, unbillable company activities, and gaps between projects. The IDC isn’t a terrible place to work, but below average for Austin.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 175 Reviews

Glassdoor has 179 Qvest.US reviews submitted anonymously by Qvest.US employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Qvest.US is right for you.