SeaQuest Reviews

2.5

32% would recommend to a friend

(111 total reviews)
avatar

Vince Covino

36% approve of CEO

22% positive business outlook

SeaQuest has an employee rating of 2.5 out of 5 stars, based on 111 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The SeaQuest employee rating is 35% below average for employers within the Arts, entertainment and recreation industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

111 reviews
1.0
12 Apr 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Working with the variety of animals. My co workers are all awesome!!

Cons

Toxic environment with the many interactions. I was not hired on to be a dancing bear I was hired to care for the animals. The HR department (the higher ups) need to be brought back down to reality and do our jobs for one or two weeks and do ALL of our responsibilities and daily tasks AND take a million interactions. The higher ups don’t care. They don’t care that animals are laying in their own fecal or the animal has been actively pacing and scratching. They don’t care if the animals have maggots in their enclosures. Or the black widow infestation. Or the cockroaches. They don’t care that it is unbelievably hot and it’s not even summer yet. They only care about the KPI’s and their token count. Be ready to get yelled at and told that all animals need to have more enrichments but we can’t find anytime to make enrichments and if we make a request for certain enrichments we are told that there isn’t enough money in the budget. They will take away bonuses saying that they can’t afford to give out bonuses. This company is a joke.

1.0
2 Oct 2022

Bad

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Playing with animals Free access inside Learn more about animals Teach youth Inspire younger generations

Cons

Rude managers They fire anyone for anything Mostly teenagers working No possibility of moving out of position The company does not care about animals well being and will ship them off when they get older and no longer as cute You will get in trouble for trying to teach kids how to respectfully treat an animal

1.0
30 Mar 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The team members do genuinely care about the animals, however department turnover rate was 88%

Cons

C level management will throw staff and animals under the bus to try to make a profit or save money. During COVID they furloughed every staff member (except some management) without pay, insurance or access to using vacation/sick time. They groom their general/husbandry managers to be "yes men" by intimidating them and as a result those managers (who are mostly young 20s) will scapegoat staff out of fear of the higher ups. Communication is basically the game telephone and is untrustworthy; despite our teams' interaction workload increasing 300% in a year, raises that were promised multiple times never happened and instead they fired people during yearly reviews to save money. Management wouldn't approve basic facility needs; there was no dishwasher so dishes were hand washed in cold water b/c the hot water broke, the dryer and washing machine only worked with duct tape and there were a few times staff bought animal supplies with their own money. They will say animal welfare is one of their 3 pillars but the evidence speaks to the contrary. I lost count of how many dead animals I have seen. Animals were often obtained from sketchy sources with their health unknown or sickly and were either put directly on exhibit with questionable quarantine procedures or were placed in a less than desirable holding facility because they didn't have room for the animal yet. Animals often escaped from exhibits that management built improperly b/c they didn't want to pay a professional. Interactions were conflicting in nature; kinkajous and sloths were brought in to do daily interactions despite being nocturnal, baby otters were separated from their families despite being a highly social species and were often kept alone, as was the capybara who was frequently cornered by guests despite being a skiddish, social rodent species. Staff was told to withhold diet amounts from animals so that they would be more interactive for guests who could feed them, but that led to aggression from some species (the sharks would bump you in the stingray tank looking for food). Staff were discouraged from filing incident reports for themselves, only for guests. Exhibits were often not big enough or suited for the animal to thrive, just to survive. Overall very sad to see so many staff members care about these animals but not have the resources or voice to make changes that the company is blind to.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 111 Reviews

Glassdoor has 116 SeaQuest reviews submitted anonymously by SeaQuest employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if SeaQuest is right for you.