Pros
CEO is very transparent Unique market opportunity
Cons
Heads of discipline are often dismissive and rude. Collaboration is encouraged by studio leadership, but in reality, there are restrictions around who can ask certain questions, what type of questions can be asked, as well as who is privy to documentation. Processes for decision-making are overly complex, with a high level of dependency on senior leadership. As a result, even straightforward decisions take considerable time, and constant follow-ups are required. There is inconsistency in accountability across the studio, with some individuals held to different standards than others. Issues raised are explained away and outcomes of management feedback surveys seem to be non-existent, Recent policy changes have reduced flexibility. For example, employees who are unwell but able to work from home are required to take sick leave, which can contribute to people attending the office while unwell, ultimately impacting productivity negatively. There is more emphasis on process than delivery. Employees who attempt to support teams outside their immediate one are discouraged from doing so and told to remain within their defined roles. Some hires from larger studios have introduced practices that do not align well with what the studio needs. Career progression can feel like it’s based on subjectivity and manager preference rather than ability. Diversity and inclusion at the senior levels of the studio have declined recently.
