Torticity Reviews

Something isn’t right. This company is the most unnerving, chronically underperforming, culmination of clashing egos I have ever witnessed. The senior management team are all friends from another company in which their colleagues were all convicted of fraud. These people then left Bankrate and created Torticity, these are people who have never done an ounce of work in the medical field or lien field, EVER. Every second of my time here was bizarre. Torticity does not turn a profit. PERIOD. Do a DEEP dive into every person on their website. Trust me, you won’t be disappointed. Something to get you started: during my time there, one of their founders and their Chief Financial Officer abruptly quit in a very strange manner. To date, they still do not have a CFO. A company that brings in millions of dollars in investment money has no CFO. Next they brought in a new CEO and claimed he was a stranger before the interview process but I urge you to do your own research. That was such an odd lie that ended a truly strange sequence of events. That’s just the beginning.

The Board of Directors has permitted a corporate hierarchy characterized by a profound lack of accountability at the C-level, resulting in severe operational, cultural, and ethical repercussions. This absence of effective oversight has cultivated a workplace environment marked by pervasive hostility, toxicity, and abusive practices, which have significantly undermined organizational health, employee morale, and overall productivity. The failure to implement robust governance mechanisms has allowed these issues to persist, creating a detrimental impact on the company’s reputation and operational stability. Regardless of whether this lack of oversight is the result of incompetence, disengagement, or a willful disregard for governance responsibilities, the failure to implement meaningful control mechanisms or enforce clear accountability checkpoints has resulted in organizational outcomes that are both deeply troubling and increasingly difficult to justify—ethically, operationally, or financially. Within this structure, executive leadership operates with near-total autonomy, free to pursue personal interests without meaningful consequence, often at the direct expense of the business’s strategic priorities and internal cohesion. This pattern has become especially pronounced over the past 18 months, during which the effects of executive disengagement and poor decision-making have escalated into business-critical risks. Executives routinely disappear from essential workflows and decision points for extended periods, make irreversible and high-impact decisions without appropriate consultation or context, and misuse company funds or resources with impunity. Equally damaging is the neglect and mismanagement of their direct reports, which has created an unstable environment marked by high attrition, confusion around roles and responsibilities, and an erosion of institutional knowledge. Collectively, these behaviors reflect a leadership culture that prioritizes self-preservation over stewardship—and a board that has failed to intervene.