Bluewolf Reviews

3.7

70% would recommend to a friend

(433 total reviews)
avatar

Eric Berridge

83% approve of CEO

66% positive business outlook

Bluewolf has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 433 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Bluewolf employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

433 reviews
1.0
19 Apr 2019

Poor Leadership and Culture in ANZ

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Able to work autonomously. - The delivery teams are highly capable. - Affiliation to Salesforce as a partner keeps the Bluewolf brand relevant.

Cons

Management - The management team in ANZ are very good at telling you what you want to hear. The reality is, that there is always a hidden agenda. There is no genuine interest to help their team. Great companies succeed because of their people. Attrition levels are high based on the lack of trust with management. It also doesn't help that the IBM management team have taken over. I once spoke to an individual within the GBS unit who said they would rely on the new employees to do the work for them until they retire. Working within a team where others don't pull their weight, doesn't sound like a recipe for success. Go-to-market strategy - Time and time again, I would hear about the same customers they have been dealing with for the last 10 years. The truth is, no one that I have seen in their prospect lists would want to be within a 10 mile radius of IBM, or a sub-standard Salesforce partner. Re-invigorating the brand by deploying IBM employees into the division only sets them up for the same longer term problems IBM faces today. Yes, they remain a synonymous name in the tech industry due to large renewal contracts, but as time has progressed, the IBM name and presence in market continues to fade, paving way for new innovative behemoths like AWS. What are they actually selling? I've seen them lose more business to other partners because they are not capable of connecting to customer's in today's economy. They have a good vision, but lack the ability to execute. I also believe that the local management team really do not have the experience to operate at an executive level, hindering their ability to drive meaningful engagements. - It will be the same set of customers for the next 10 years if they don’t get it right. Culture - Ginni Rometty is arguably a great leader. She presents and articulates the vision and mission of the company very well. Her years of experience validate she is the right person for the job. It is interesting however that when she visits offices outside of the US, local management teams scramble to present themselves in an alternative light. In other multinational corporations I have dealt with, CEO's wanted to see their staff for who they really were, all so they could understand challenges, and genuinely help them succeed. Covering up what your local office operation looks like doesn't help anyone, and is one of the many reasons why IBM continues to struggle today. - The various divisions in GTS and GBS are also very disparate. There is no real working synergy. - IBM continues to operate in an imaginary world where their products and services are great on paper, but fail to deliver on what customer's actually want. This creates a lack of trust within the market, impacting employees beliefs and alignment to values with the company. - The integration of Bluewolf into IBM has impacted culture, but if there was a great culture to begin with, then this would have been a minor speed bump. The truth is, numerous individuals (short-term and long-term employees) have left the organisation, stating their frustrations with the cons stated above. - Great culture starts from the top - too bad it’s non-existent in ANZ. A new article was released in the media which showcases a legal case between a senior executive and the company. The key takeaway here is that the culture is questionable, even for long standing employees. Will they really take care of you? Search on Google for "IBM exec awarded $180,000 payout after restructure leaves him with nothing to do"

2.0
14 Sept 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The real pro at Bluewolf are its people. Everyone is willing to help each other out, everyone want to work toward the goals set in the project etc. The people make working there bearable. New manager sent to Australia to improve process around scoping (locking in scope) and employee reviews. CEO seemed like a nice guy and a good CEO, however being in Australia I didn't have much to do with him personally.

Cons

Though everyone is very nice and wants to work hard, management don't have the employees' backs. There were too many time when, as a consultant who's job it is to call out what should and shouldn't be done in a project during scoping and requirements gathering, issues were called out or items were said to not be possible within the time frame or budget/ resources available... management would walk out of a meeting with the client and tell the staff that it all must be done by a certain date, completely disregarding the 'worker bees' opinion..... it was never done by that date despite hours upon hours of overtime. This happened again and again. Scope creep was constantly allowed to occur and senior management would let it happen despite push back by consultants. Pay rises were not good if you got one at all. Annual reviews did not reflect any of the real work you had done in the company as management didn't seek for feedback about you until after they review you. Your review affects promotion, pay rises and ability to go to training courses. They were happy to gather feedback after the review and give a bad score but even though they would come back with a remark of, 'oh you shouldn't have gotten that score'..... they wouldn't change it despite having the power to do so.... this happened to many, many people in the 2014/2015. Most likely a cost cutting strategy to avoid pay rises. Manager was sent from the states, I really hope she can clean up the management issues in BW Aus. They need it.

1.0
9 May 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- AU MD removed. - the people and sense of family and loyalty - projects were small that if you are a junior looking to learn as much as possible (you get thrown in the deep in) so you have to do anything and everything (wait - isn't this a con?) - OSW (whilst it still existed)

Cons

- Management. All these talks regarding employee benefit since 2013 - Management. Doesn't have your back and will make you work weekends - Management. Salary review? Bonuses? What bonuses? People had threatened to leave (and have left in the masses) and thus had to give them pay hikes! - Management. Threaten legal work rights to employees looking for new jobs that they had to outright lie where they are going. - No training for staff - Staff put on crappy assignments and continually chopping and changing - Senior staff members doing low level work continually due to insufficient resources

Viewing 1 - 3 of 433 Reviews

Glassdoor has 455 Bluewolf reviews submitted anonymously by Bluewolf employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Bluewolf is right for you.