CSL Reviews

3.5

59% would recommend to a friend

(684 total reviews)
avatar

Gordon Naylor

Not enough data to show CEO approval

42% positive business outlook

CSL has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 684 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The CSL employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

684 reviews
1.0
1 Feb 2019

Toxic Culture

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good worklife balance - as a lot of people are not motivated to do more than the minimum - not rewarded to do so. Great place to retire or if you want to get paid to do very little thinking. There are great people in manufacturing that knows what they are doing, but the support functions (bar a few really good people) are toxic.

Cons

So much, this is probably the only organisation that I will not recommend to anyone. I am generally realistic that most organisations has pros and cons, and generally speaking it’s unfair to taint one organisation with the same brush. But my experience here is not something I wish upon anyone. 1. Incompetent middle management: there are a few good directors and senior managers that are good leaders - in the sense that they care about their employees and skilled in their jobs. But most (even the recent external hires) are useless. Refuses to listen to feedback, put the blame on their own staff, bad mouth their own staff to stakeholders, I have even witness active sabotage by managers to their own staff - as they felt threatened. Managers and directors also provides absolutely no coaching or job training, and there are empty promises given to staff (promises that they were in no position to make good). Some of the managers have risen the ranks purely due to tenure, which is problematic as they have no people leadership qualities - or received training. I see a misalignment between what is promoted at townhalls and other executive level briefings - and what’s actually encouraged and supported by middle management. 2. Change resistance: I say ‘resistance’ only because there is no other word for something much harsher. The directors and managers mentioned above actively sabotage change - lip service is paid that we need to change and we are doing things to change - but in reality, efforts made by employees to actually improve things are stopped by middle management. There are recent hires that are proactive and really trying to push for change - in some department that’s seen some improvements. But in most, that’s met with such toxic resistance and denial - that there’s been high attrition rates of recently hires. 3. Integrity - this was so lacking, some directors knew their managers were incompetent but does nothing, and no feedback is passed onto senior management. Managers lie to directors on work done by the team and take credit from their team members. I’ve seen manager ‘bury’ team members when they see them as a threat (real or not). 4. Accountability- no clear accountabilities, lots of pointing fingers, passing the blame etc. resulting in a few people and teams taking on the bulk of the work and other teams being leeches and dead weight. This is probably the worst job I’ve had, I’ve worked much longer hours at other companies, with more work pressure, more deliverables and much higher expectations. but this is the first and only place that has disgusted me. Once again it’s not all teams, I’ve really enjoyed the interaction with a few of the manufacturing teams.

1.0
30 Aug 2017

Trainwreck

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Some employees who are very knowledgable about their particular specialist areas - parking - need to get to 20 word minimum and struggling

Cons

- poor middle/upper management and absolutely no leadership - outdated technology in every corner - no staff learning and development initiatives - silo upon silo - project management often disastrous

1.0
17 May 2022

Dumpster fire team

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Shares options to a select few - Secure employment due to high staff turnover

Cons

Where do I start. CSL is large but CSL Research in Melbourne is relatively small. Most teams are nice but Data Science team is awful due to their leader. Leader doesn't even know what Data Science is, let alone how to lead a team. Expect a leader that is inexperienced, with only some weak generic IT skills that has climbed to the top due to manipulation and theatrics. Expect lack of vision, scale and expertise and outdated tech. Meetings filled with conflict, being yelled at and micromanaged. Expect for this to be framed as "high stress and high conflict are positive". Expect constant staff turnover where everyone else is blamed. Expect to learn no skills that are even related to data science in any other company. Basically there are no positives and I am looking to leave ASAP to anyone that will have me.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 684 Reviews

Glassdoor has 901 CSL reviews submitted anonymously by CSL employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if CSL is right for you.