The have and have nots... - Financial Advisor AIG Employee Review

2.0
20 Aug 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great people in the company and positive management

Cons

There are a handful of extremely wealthy agents that put people into a managed money platform they know under performs and IA's with terrible caps. This small group of advisors have huge amounts of contracts under them that they do not service and have never met, but their tenure allows the renewals and enrollment to pay them quite nicely. New agents receive picked over books and eventually leave, when they do, the business is rolled up to the select few. I have seen partnerships that the new person does basic enrollments and the tenured hand picks the clients with assets. Rinse repeat, until you have agents making 24k and the select few making $500k+ and there are no friends in those trenches.

Explore other reviews about AIG

5.0
20 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good benefits, good people in New York

Cons

Management out of touch with reality

2.0
28 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Salary and vacation days are good but be careful you are not taking on multiple roles for this position.

Cons

If you’re considering applying, make sure to ask in the interview: Will there be someone else doing what I am doing? If not, the team is understaffed and all the responsibility will rest on your shoulders. Even with the vacation days, your days will be swamped and stressful. It is NOT worth it. Out of curiosity, I’ve been looking at their latest job postings for my department and there is so much packed into one role, it’s wild. You can tell the person they’re trying to replace clearly wore too many hats and it will be a long struggle to fill this position. Are my team members working in other time zones? You can face several early morning calls based on their hiring pattern. Some teams will require annual or quarterly traveling. Over the years, the company is hiring mainly white managers domestically in the USA, while lower roles are hired abroad or contractors. Meetings to accomodate offshore hours are brutal. What percentage of the day is in meetings? If you don’t have time to deliver on output because of meetings, you will likely have to stay late to complete the work. The company seems to hire very good talkers but not a lot of do-ers. Several meetings involved more people than needed. Managers seem to think “if I have to suffer through this meeting, everyone has to suffer”. If managers are fortunate enough to delegate the deliverables, they can handle some meetings by themselves. Who would be handling my onboarding and training when I start? If it is not your direct manager, your early success will be at the mercy of your peers who understandably are not responsible for onboarding you. Sadly, I have observed that the people-managers do not like to manage people. In fact, they value those that manage the manager and the team’s roadmap plan for them. The managers don’t seem to want to oversee the team or their deliverables. If there is a job change (salary, position, hours) how is that communicated? In my experience these things were not communicated or consented to. The change would apply in the system and you would have to conform accordingly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All