Should change name to What-A-Mess, not Modis - Sales Representative Adecco Employee Review

1.0
2 July 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good co-workers but they will fire/lay-off the good ones quickly so don't get used to it. Depending on who you are/job function/location, you don't have to work too hard and you have no supervision so it is a great place for those people.

Cons

Poor recruiter training/expectations, bad (worse than poor) management with lots of changes, archaic website and marketing department, no support for sales at all, when 1 division does poorly, they lay-off/fire people to balance every month to 6 weeks. Inconsistent vision means you may be hired for something and re-diverted entirely.

avatar
Adecco Response
8y
Thank you for your thorough review. We take this feedback seriously. We'd like to identify the parties involved in your negative experience, so please connect with our team by emailing "socialfeedback@adeccona.com."

Explore other reviews about Adecco

5.0
4 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The team was great to work with

Cons

Could have used an additional recruiter for the time I was there to free up the store manager to meet with more clients

1.0
27 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Onboarding for new hires was smooth

Cons

My experience with Adecco Staffing Agency reflects a significant disconnect between the expectations set during onboarding and the reality of assignment execution. There appears to be a consistent misalignment between candidate skill sets and the roles they are placed into, which not only undermines performance but also creates unnecessary inefficiencies for both the employee and the client organization. Assignments are often presented without full transparency regarding scope, schedule, or operational requirements, resulting in frequent adjustments that disrupt workflow continuity and personal planning. Additionally, there is a notable deficiency in accurate and timely reporting. Communication regarding assignment details, schedule changes, and performance expectations lacks consistency and clarity. This creates ambiguity in accountability and limits the employee’s ability to effectively manage deliverables. From a process standpoint, this reflects weak coordination and insufficient control mechanisms within their staffing and reporting systems. Most concerning is the apparent lack of advocacy for the employee. A staffing agency should function as an intermediary that ensures alignment between employer needs and employee capabilities while also safeguarding fair treatment and clear communication. In this case, there is a perception that employee concerns—particularly those related to schedule changes, workload expectations, and workplace conditions—are not adequately addressed or escalated. This ultimately results in a work environment that feels transactional rather than supportive, with limited consideration for employee well-being or long-term success.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All