employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Amazon Web Services

Part of Amazon

Is this your company?

High TC, but at the cost of your soul and sanity - Senior Software Development Manager Amazon Web Services Employee Review

1.0
1 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The Paycheck: Let’s be real, the total compensation (TC) is top-tier. If you can survive until your Year 3 and 4 stock vests, you’re set. The Resume Stamp: Having AWS on your resume is like a golden ticket. It opens doors everywhere else because people know if you survived here, you can handle anything. Smart Peers: You will work with some of the most brilliant engineers in the world. You’ll learn more in 6 months here than in 3 years at a mid-tier company.

Cons

PIP Culture: The "Unregretted Attrition" (URA) goals are real. Managers are often forced to identify a bottom percentage of the team to put on Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs) or "Focus" to meet corporate quotas, even if the whole team is high-performing. It creates a "hunger games" vibe. Work-Life Balance (WLB): It doesn't exist. Expect to be on-call for services that "break the internet" if they go down. High-severity (Sev2) tickets at 3:00 AM are a regular occurrence, and you’re expected to be back at your desk by 9:00 AM. Leadership Principles (LPs) as Weapons: The 16 Leadership Principles are used to justify everything. "Dive Deep" is often just code for micromanagement, and "Have Backbone; Disagree and Commit" usually means "you can complain, but we’re doing it my way anyway." Return to Office (RTO 5): The recent mandate for 5 days in-office feels like a "silent layoff" tactic. It has destroyed morale for those who built lives around flexibility, and the offices are often overcrowded and loud.

Explore other reviews about Amazon Web Services

5.0
8 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great team when you have a manager and full team that works well and collaborates well. Stock is great. And you know when youre doing well, the pay increase is roughly the same as everyone else.

Cons

Low perks compared to other FAANG companies and most teams have high turn over

4.0
12 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Operated in systems that had real scale, operational constraints, and production consequences.

Cons

Working at Amazon Web Services gave me strong exposure to distributed systems, operational ownership, and production-scale infrastructure, but there were definitely tradeoffs as well. One downside was that, like many large organizations, ownership could become fragmented. You often own a subsystem or workflow rather than an entire product end-to-end, which can limit exposure to broader architectural decision-making unless you deliberately seek it out. There was also significant process overhead. Design reviews, operational processes, dependency coordination, and organizational alignment were valuable for learning rigor, but they can slow iteration compared to smaller engineering teams. Another challenge is that large internal ecosystems can abstract away infrastructure complexity. AWS has extensive internal tooling, deployment systems, and operational platforms, which are powerful, but some of that experience does not transfer directly outside the company. I also found that operational work could dominate engineering time at points. Handling production issues, retries, integration failures, and on-call responsibilities teaches reliability engineering well, but it can reduce the amount of time spent on deeper technical exploration or greenfield development. Finally, there is the perception aspect. AWS is a strong name, but experienced interviewers know there is wide variance between teams and roles. The company name opens doors, but ultimately you still need to demonstrate technical depth, ownership, and strong engineering judgment independently of the brand.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All