employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Amazon Web Services

Part of Amazon

Is this your company?

Great place to learn business and operations - but its def. not "Still Day 1" - Software Development Manager Amazon Web Services Employee Review

3.0
12 Dec 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Great place to learn business - from one of the most successful companies in the world - Great place to learn operational best practices - Smart, driven coworkers (mostly) - Good practices on DEI compared to other companies i've worked at. - HR moves at glacial speed - Pre-pandemic was pretty fun, got to go to a Katy Perry/Lil Nas X concert that was a thank you to all the employees. - Culture of fear and PIPs and URA you read about on Blind was never true in my org. When folks got fired they really had to screw up.

Cons

- Internal tooling is painful to use and ugly to look at(SIM for ticketing, Chime for calls, CTI) but it does scale for 1m employees. - AWS Recruiting is poorly led and is difficult to hire SDEs because of shared SDE pipelines and competition among SDMs and rotating door of ever-changing recruiters. Never felt like a partnership between HMs and Recruiters. Makes it harder for me to hire as an SDM. - It is definitely not "Day 1" and they should embrace that. The culture of "mechanisms" and govt. auditing requirements and operational launch requirements prevents most teams from moving fast and innovating. By the time a team has already done that work , 3 competitors have launched and building out their customer bases. - People are kind of boring (or afraid of bringing their authentic selves). I asked my team what music they liked and several said Coldplay. Like Coldplay is fine and all, especially their older albums, but what a vanilla answer...

Explore other reviews about Amazon Web Services

5.0
16 June 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great company with challenging assignments

Cons

Lot is expected of you

4.0
12 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Operated in systems that had real scale, operational constraints, and production consequences.

Cons

Working at Amazon Web Services gave me strong exposure to distributed systems, operational ownership, and production-scale infrastructure, but there were definitely tradeoffs as well. One downside was that, like many large organizations, ownership could become fragmented. You often own a subsystem or workflow rather than an entire product end-to-end, which can limit exposure to broader architectural decision-making unless you deliberately seek it out. There was also significant process overhead. Design reviews, operational processes, dependency coordination, and organizational alignment were valuable for learning rigor, but they can slow iteration compared to smaller engineering teams. Another challenge is that large internal ecosystems can abstract away infrastructure complexity. AWS has extensive internal tooling, deployment systems, and operational platforms, which are powerful, but some of that experience does not transfer directly outside the company. I also found that operational work could dominate engineering time at points. Handling production issues, retries, integration failures, and on-call responsibilities teaches reliability engineering well, but it can reduce the amount of time spent on deeper technical exploration or greenfield development. Finally, there is the perception aspect. AWS is a strong name, but experienced interviewers know there is wide variance between teams and roles. The company name opens doors, but ultimately you still need to demonstrate technical depth, ownership, and strong engineering judgment independently of the brand.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All