Great for a short stay. Lab Scientist with No PhD? Stay away - Scientist AstraZeneca Employee Review

4.0
4 June 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Very interesting work. Nice people for the most part and a lot of resources available compared with small companies. A lot of intelligent people.

Cons

If you want to be a scientist and don’t have a PhD, you’ll have a very difficult time progressing in a career here. Fresh kids out of the program start 2-3 levels higher than those who have been in industry for 10 years or more. You have to work your tail off to get to the level of fresh PhD’s. Often time, it takes 15-20 years of experience to get to the level that new PhD’s with 0 years of industry experience come in as. The reasoning being that this is an unofficial reward based system to incentivize getting your PhD. You do find some competitiveness as per most large companies that gets annoying.

Explore other reviews about AstraZeneca

5.0
17 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

great place to work and develop!

Cons

could maybe have more transparency

1.0
19 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The page is friendly to make an application.

Cons

As an experienced healthcare analytics and commercial leader, I applied to 104 U.S.-based positions at AstraZeneca between 2025 and 2026 that closely matched my background. Despite receiving interviews from peer organizations, I did not receive a single recruiter interaction. I fully understand the competitiveness of hiring, but such a complete lack of engagement raises questions about potential overreliance on AI screening or unintended bias.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All