employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Baker University

Is this your company?

Low pay and bad culturee - Professor Baker University Employee Review

1.0
5 Jan 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Having worked here a long time, there are friends for life that havee come and gone. Some eliminated.

Cons

Baker has different environments based on where you work. The College of Arts and Sciences in Baldwin City is different from the School of Professional and Graduate Studies in Overland Park. In general, the leadership at Baker is incompetent providing no clear direction of plan. The President is not able to put together a team that knows what it is doing and certainly does not have qualifications for the positions they hold. The pay at all locations is much below competitors in the region. You should look for work elsewhere!

Explore other reviews about Baker University

5.0
28 July 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Fantastic faculty and administration, diversity of programs offered, gorgeous campus (especially in the fall), new sports facilities for most sports

Cons

compensation could be better but is average for the area for similar positions

1.0
6 Feb 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I worked in the Marketing and Communications department at Baker University and genuinely enjoyed collaborating with students, faculty, and staff across campus. The campus community is made up of caring people who believe in the university’s mission, and several colleagues in the department were talented, thoughtful, and committed to producing high-quality work. When expectations were clear, the projects were both rewarding and creative. Baker University has strong people and significant potential across campus.

Cons

The Marketing and Communications department would benefit from greater consistency and organization. Priorities often shifted without clear explanation, and meetings were occasionally canceled or rescheduled with little notice. Communication from leadership could be more transparent and proactive, particularly when it comes to setting expectations and providing feedback. There was also a reliance on AI that often felt unnecessary and, at times, detracted from the quality of the final product. Direction on projects was frequently unclear, and internal systems and tools were not always used effectively, or in some cases at all, which led to confusion, additional work, and an overall challenging work environment. The department would benefit from clearer structure and more consistent communication to better support staff success. With greater transparency and consistency from leadership, it could become a much stronger and more positive environment for employees and in supporting other departments across campus.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All