Walking on eggshells - Proposal Coordinator CGI Employee Review

3.0
18 May 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Most of the people are hard working professionals and are very good (and have a strong desire to become better for themselves and the company and its stakeholders) at what they do. They are enjoyable to work with despite having to suffer the cons (below).

Cons

The general concensus on most management's skills seems to be that they do not manage well enough to be entrusted with one's career and evaluations. Open door policy does not exist and, as a matter of fact, you're putting your career at grave risk if you dare execute an open door meeting. Got the feeling that the management model was bipolarity.

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
28 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Very friendly atmosphere and great people

Cons

Hybrid schedule required and city commute

1.0
16 June 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All