Expensive Health Insurance - Functional Consultant CGI Employee Review

3.0
30 June 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The project I'm on pays for parking. The people I work with are really nice. The office is really old but it's close to a lot of restaurants so there's plenty of options for lunch.

Cons

Beware of the high deductible insurance plan which is your only option. You will pay at least 2k out of pocket before your insurance covers anything which is probably why your benefits start the first day. This is something you need to consider before changing jobs. If you get an offer be sure to subtract 2k from the salary because this will go towards healthcare and if you're adding a family to your plan the deductible is even higher. I'm paying almost the same amount for healthcare every pay period as my last job, but with less coverage and more out of pocket costs.

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
9 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Inclusive workplace; great benefits; supportive of personal and professional growth; decent compensation for the area; - especially given the benefits; great leadership; strong culture and values.

Cons

Can be ups and downs if you are in a more volatile area of work which has contracts come and go. AI has increased that volatility across the industry and CGI hasn’t been immune. Individuals experience can vary by manager, but it’s a very good company.

1.0
16 June 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All