Absolute trash - Engineer CGI Employee Review

1.0
14 Nov 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

It's employment and a paycheck. That's about all on the positive side.

Cons

Utterly incompetent senior management. Non-technical people making technical decisions. Did I mention incompetent senior management? Add duplicitous: in private: "We fully expect employees to work 55+ hours a week, nothing should get in the way of completing a project and we expect you to forfeit time off to finish those projects" / in public: "...Your health is important and we don't want you working excessive hours, we want you taking time off because you earned it." Garbage insurance plan with a ridiculously high ($4K) deductible. The company saves some money and passes those savings onto the board of directors. No raises. No bonuses. Non-competitive salary offers. Bleeding talent and bringing on subpar sub-contractors to stop the bleeding. Run in the other direction. As fast as possible.

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
18 June 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Work life balance, growth, quality

Cons

Less pay compared to market

1.0
16 June 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All