Onboarding - Senior Software Engineer Capgemini Employee Review

5.0
19 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1. The onboarding process was smooth, easy to understand and timely executed. 2. The communication from the HRs and respective SPOCs and handling of the queries was great. 3. The first day of onboarding was good and overall efforts from the onboarding team is highly appreciated.

Cons

No cons as such till date

avatar
Capgemini Response
2mo
Thank you for sharing 5-star feedback. We are pleased to hear that you found the onboarding process smooth, easy to understand, and timely executed, and that the overall experience was well coordinated from the start. Providing a structured and seamless onboarding journey is an important focus for us at Capgemini, and it is encouraging to know that your first day went well and that the efforts of the onboarding Capgemini were highly appreciated. We also appreciate your recognition of the strong communication from our HR colleagues and respective SPOCs, as well as the effective handling of your queries, as timely and clear communication plays a key role in helping new joiners settle in with confidence. We are equally glad to note that you have not observed any concerns or areas for improvement so far. Your feedback reinforces our continued focus on delivering a supportive and transparent onboarding experience. Thank you once again for sharing your thoughts and for being a valued part of Capgemini. Wishing you continued growth and success in your career journey ahead.

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
5 July 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Company provides training on soft skills and technical skills prior to placing on a project.

Cons

Client contracts can end unexpectedly so you may not get to work on a project long term and change from project to project.

1.0
30 June 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All