Excellent work culture with balanced work life balance. - Azure Data Engineer Capgemini Employee Review

5.0
5 Apr 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Work culture or environment is good with good learning and growth.

Cons

Hiking compensation is not so good; it all depends on how much profit the company generates in business.

avatar
Capgemini Response
1y
Thank you for sharing your feedback. We're pleased to hear that you find our work culture and environment conducive to learning and growth. We strive to create an atmosphere where employees can thrive and develop their skills, and it's encouraging to know that our efforts are being recognized. However, we understand your concerns regarding compensation hikes being tied to the company's profitability. We recognize that consistent and fair compensation is a critical aspect of job satisfaction. While our current model aims to align rewards with business performance, we are actively exploring ways to improve our compensation structure to better meet the needs of our employees. Your feedback is invaluable in helping us identify areas for improvement, and we appreciate your honesty. Thank you for being a part of our organization and for contributing to our ongoing development.

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
25 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good inclusive culture , supportive community

Cons

You have to be proactive and show above and beyond quality

1.0
30 June 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All