Pros
- Flexible
- Travel Opportunities
- Hybrid Model
Cons
If you have another offer, I would suggest go there. This company is undergoing frequent changes and reorganizations. They are currently in the middle of another one.
- High turnover: Many employees are pushed out or resign due to constant leadership changes.
- Resistance to change: The company refuses to modernize and blocks rebranding efforts.
- One size fits all: Every region must operate the same, including providing brokers with incorrect or incomplete materials in an effort to keep it global
- Disorganized structure with poor long-term vision and strategy.
- Communication is consistently poor across all departments.
- Constant budget cuts and slow processes.
- Training is inadequate, especially since the training team has left.
- Insufficient support: Teams lack the tools and resources to do their jobs, an issue ignored for years.
- Some managers are in different countries with large time differences and are not trained on local policies, causing delays or problems that fall on employees.
- Management is reactive: Ideas are rarely listened to until a problem escalates.
- Employee concerns are often only addressed to minimize company risk, rather than solving root problems. Once they detect there is no risk, the concern is ignored or minimized.
- Most new ideas are rejected outright.
- Sick leave policy exists but is penalized; managers may expect employees to work during recovery days.
- Problems are rarely addressed at their root; issues are treated superficially.
- Heavy workloads
- Unclear communication about structure
- Lack of clear, specific feedback
- Projects from upper management don't have ultimate follow through or meet deadlines.