Worst working experience - Anonymous employee Dragons Group Employee Review

1.0
10 Nov 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The collaboration between teams and the openness towards welcoming new joiners were genuinely positive aspects, and most colleagues are nice. The office is also quite centrally located, and they do provide you with a MacBook.

Cons

There are so many reasons why I would not recommend working for this company. They lure you in during the interview process with false expectations, an okay-ish salary, and promises of an amazing work environment with opportunities for growth, but don’t fall for it. From day one, something felt off. The management in this company is appalling. There’s no proper training or onboarding, and you’re left to figure things out entirely on your own from the start. There’s little to no support from certain managers, and in some cases, you don’t even get a single one-on-one meeting with your supervisor. There’s absolutely no sense of security. The company operates through fear tactics, rumours, and by exploiting people until they’re no longer useful. Some employees conveniently disappear before their probation period ends, they go on sick leave due to the stress, or they’re fired without any logical or justified reason. Overall, working here was a deeply disappointing experience. It’s a shame, because some of the projects have real potential - but there’s no consistency in workloads, no clear goals or expectations, and the company seems far more interested in signing new clients than in taking care of its employees.

Explore other reviews about Dragons Group

5.0
10 Jan 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Clear processes and excellent communication make managing projects smooth. The team dynamic is one of the best I’ve experienced.

Cons

Occasional resourcing challenges, but leadership works hard to address them.

1
1.0
1 Jan 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The pace is fast, and employees are often expected to operate at a high level with minimal oversight. For some, this environment may feel energizing or offer accelerated exposure early in their career.

Cons

Expectations are frequently unclear, shift after decisions have already been made, or are enforced inconsistently. Employees may receive approval for a course of action and later be criticized for that same decision. Feedback is not always grounded in documented facts or actual client input, and internal narratives can change in ways that contradict prior conversations or results. High performers are often asked to absorb additional scope to compensate for team or resourcing gaps, without corresponding authority or support, and are then blamed when systemic issues arise. Raising concerns about workload, quality, or timelines is not consistently met with problem-solving, creating an environment where employees begin to second-guess their judgment and lose trust in leadership.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All