Great colleagues, work/life flexibility & foundation for your career, but awful bureaucracy & senior mgmt. - Senior Project Manager IBM Employee Review

4.0
15 June 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

IBM is a wonderful place to build a foundation for your career. There are loads of educational opportunities offered, including internal courses / curricula and external education funding. It is also easier to explore a new career opportunity within IBM, since the company is quite large and has so many roles that need to be filled. The absolute best aspect of working at IBM, though, at least in my product development area, is the quality of your colleagues. You truly are surrounded by some of the brightest, most creative and driven people in the world of technology, and that pride shows through, even in the face of poor management. Finally, the benefits, especially work/life flexibility, are very good. Work-at-home is now widely accepted, and remote teams are the norm. Vacation time is only loosely tracked, and the general attitude is that as long as you get your work done and are available for necessary meetings, you are free to take time off or work flexible hours. I also believe IBM is a great place for women and minorities to succeed -- as a woman, I have never once felt I was being treated differently than my male colleagues, and the company has a plethora of diversity groups and communities for all employees to join.

Cons

Management, management, management. Oh yes - and bureaucracy rivaling the US Government. Your experience at IBM is 90% dependent upon how good your first-line manager is....if you have a strong, supportive manager, you'll be happy, but if you have a weak one, you're doomed to be miserable. Luckily, most first-line managers are pretty good, but they have the most thankless job in the entire company because they get it from both sides. Their departments are continually squeezed by upper management, but they are powerless to do anything about it, so they have to hear the complaining from below. Lower management has no REAL control over compensation; it's all determined in the stratosphere of executive management. Executive management at IBM, in my opinion, has degraded to ABYSMAL. I now truly believe our Senior Management flat-out LIES to us about compensation, job outsourcing, and other difficult issues. Instead of leveling with employees, they spout all sorts of sunny platitudes ("no job added in India or China is eliminating a job in the US") that we all know, from personal experience, are NOT TRUE. IBM has also become far too top-heavy, with far too many VPs running around and very little real control at the lower levels of management. We in product development cannot even travel on business without VP approval! Many of us now also believe that only those who suck up to Senior Management get the recognition and promotions available in the management ranks (technology promotions seem to be more performance-based and fair). Those who speak truth to power are often not rewarded for it. Finally, the bureaucracy inherent in an enterprise the size of IBM is frustrating, to say the least. Simple tasks, like acquiring necessary test equipment for our software releases, involve quarter-long review, negotiation, and approval processes that waste time and put programs at risk. *Finance* truly has the control over IBM -- not technology.

Explore other reviews about IBM

5.0
23 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Incredible mentorship from experienced engineers and exposure to real-world production code. The team is very supportive and encourages questions.

Cons

The onboarding process can be a bit overwhelming at first due to the complexity of the internal tools and systems.

4.0
26 Aug 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Disclaimer: A lot of what I'm writing below of course depends on the work area and management chain. But I found this to be fairly pervasive policies in IBM in my 9+ years with the company. 1. IBM's policies and management are very flexible when it comes to working remotely or accommodating various life situations (sick days, doctor visits, etc.). Management is encouraged to measure an employee by their work and impact, and not by hours spent at their office. 2. Great colleagues! Though unfortunately, many have been leaving due to the instability of IBM's HW development business. 3. At least in my area, there's a high level of flexibility on which projects should I undertake based on my and my management assessment of business impact.

Cons

1. Unfortunately, IBM still uses the "normal distribution" rating system, where at the end of the year each employee is ranked as a top contributor (5%), above average contributor (15%), average contributor (~75%), and bottom contributor (5%). This curve is difficult to apply in the R&D world, where you may have many members of the team working long and hard hours, and end up being "average contributors" at the end of the year, because there just isn't room for all to be top contributors. 2. The above may not be so disturbing, if only IBM didn't practically cancelled all raises, performance bonuses and incentive for the non top-performers. I've had a consistent "above average" rating in the last 4-5 years, and my raise and performance bonus were ridiculous mere 1.5-2% of my salary. Were I rated "average contributor" I would have gotten NOTHING. So you can imagine that people can go year after year without any raise to their salary. From talking to manager friend, this is IBM's way to eliminate the non-top-performers without having to fire them, as part of its direction of reducing US manpower. 3. Hiring freeze in many areas - again, as part of IBM's attempt to reduce its workforce across North America and Europe we see many jobs move to the India and Far East markets. This is of course upsetting to see local teams shrink and disappear, especially when many great local IBM colleagues and experts begin to drop out. From my experience thus far working with India SW teams - they are still very far away from the standards I would have expected from US and Europe based teams. 4. Poor top down communication about company's and divisions' future. Employees learn from rumors and news websites what's about to come...

636
avatar
IBM Response
10y
Thanks for sharing your experience, and we're glad that you've had a positive experience working with talented colleagues and taking advantage of IBM's programs. IBM is in the midst of a major transformation, --our Systems business is going through its own changes to strengthen competitiveness. Change is never easy. As part of our transformation, we just launched a whole new approach for how we are coaching employees, delivering feedback and managing reviews. No distribution guidelines or what some think of as 'stacked rankings." What's particularly great is that this was co-designed with our employee base from all over the world... to the tune of hundreds of thousands of page views, comments, on-line debates and discussions. IBMers even named the new system Checkpoint, to reflect the regular feedback rituals we're adopting. Managers are more empowered with the new methodology to help them acknowledge the great work of their teams and help their employees develop professionally. These steps and more are showing up in our employee surveys as well. So IBMers are feeling the change. We are confident these changes will help us in continuing to attract and retain great talent.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All