Has potential but no plan to realise that - Senior Software Engineer IBM Employee Review

2.0
24 June 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some of the best reasons for working in IBM include the following: 1. Immense scope to participate in technical forums/fora. IBM is part of nearly every technological iniative on earth and hence, any employee is bound to find something or the other that caters to their taste and skill. 2. Investment in nearly every facet of the IT business. IBM is into services, hardware, systems software and application software development. There are various teams where one could find an interesting career. 3. Fairly open with diverse mentor-mentee relationships. IBM encourages people to find mentors to help them guide them along their career. Given that there are people who are leading the technology innovation there is always scope to find someone to inspire and guide you along.

Cons

The downside is as follows: 1. Poor management. Most of management focuses only on delivery and are not interested in employee development. Anything that is not related to the deadline around the corner is irrelevant and harms delivery. Though it is vital to focus on delivery, managment doesn't recognise the importance of long term growth and totally lack a vision. Management would love to claim that their teams achieved tonnes of things but only the team members know how much they had to suffer for that. Managers prefer all of the non-delivery stuff to be done in employee's personal time. 2. Very stingy. IBM is extremely stingy as far as benefits and other facilities are concerned. Even if someone has come up with a wonderful paper and wish to present it elsewhere, they will whine and cite budget constraints thereby discouraging employees. They will pack people in the minimal quality hotel and not pay much per diem for trips abroad. They make every rupee coming out seem like it has been begged for. Anything which is not for delivery has to be paid out of employee's pockets. 3. Process. IBM only believes in process and in that process they make everything so circuitous that employee would rather suffer in silence than make use of the facilities (which are genuinely inaccessible). Simplest example would be the leave processing system. One needs to raise a request in a database which goes off to some other country and a few days later a form arrives (if at all) which needs to be filled and submitted to the manager. He will then approve it and finally you have your leave granted. In countries like India and China, procuring anything is a nightmare as the number of forms to be filled and the number of people who have to say "yes" keeps growing. 4. A lot is only on paper. This is actually a mix of management and process issues. A lot of the so-called facilities are only available on paper. If one tries to realise them, then they are made so difficult to achieve that one loses motivation pretty much immediately. 5. Hiring. IBM focuses a lot on simply meeting headcounts (number of employees are refered to as headcount). They do not even care to ensure that a particular person is good enough or not and whether it makes sense to have in a good team where the team dynamics can get affected. 6. Mindset. IBM still ives in the mainframe mindset. They only know how to make things utterly complicated and messy. Nothing is simple at IBM. Even the tools and software that we are forced to use are arduous and unimaginably stupid. All of us keep wondering who designed them. Many sotware engineers would raise objections which will be dissolved in the numerous process and higher management decisions. Eventually everyone starts thinking along these complicated lines. They can make anything messy. Even when they adopt something from the global software community, they have to change it to suit IBM's god-knows-what-policy and then what comes out is an extremely messy and convoluted approach to the same thing.

Explore other reviews about IBM

5.0
12 May 2026
Anonymous freelancer
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Amazing work culture with amazing all.

Cons

Amazing employment culture and amazing seating.

4.0
26 Aug 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Disclaimer: A lot of what I'm writing below of course depends on the work area and management chain. But I found this to be fairly pervasive policies in IBM in my 9+ years with the company. 1. IBM's policies and management are very flexible when it comes to working remotely or accommodating various life situations (sick days, doctor visits, etc.). Management is encouraged to measure an employee by their work and impact, and not by hours spent at their office. 2. Great colleagues! Though unfortunately, many have been leaving due to the instability of IBM's HW development business. 3. At least in my area, there's a high level of flexibility on which projects should I undertake based on my and my management assessment of business impact.

Cons

1. Unfortunately, IBM still uses the "normal distribution" rating system, where at the end of the year each employee is ranked as a top contributor (5%), above average contributor (15%), average contributor (~75%), and bottom contributor (5%). This curve is difficult to apply in the R&D world, where you may have many members of the team working long and hard hours, and end up being "average contributors" at the end of the year, because there just isn't room for all to be top contributors. 2. The above may not be so disturbing, if only IBM didn't practically cancelled all raises, performance bonuses and incentive for the non top-performers. I've had a consistent "above average" rating in the last 4-5 years, and my raise and performance bonus were ridiculous mere 1.5-2% of my salary. Were I rated "average contributor" I would have gotten NOTHING. So you can imagine that people can go year after year without any raise to their salary. From talking to manager friend, this is IBM's way to eliminate the non-top-performers without having to fire them, as part of its direction of reducing US manpower. 3. Hiring freeze in many areas - again, as part of IBM's attempt to reduce its workforce across North America and Europe we see many jobs move to the India and Far East markets. This is of course upsetting to see local teams shrink and disappear, especially when many great local IBM colleagues and experts begin to drop out. From my experience thus far working with India SW teams - they are still very far away from the standards I would have expected from US and Europe based teams. 4. Poor top down communication about company's and divisions' future. Employees learn from rumors and news websites what's about to come...

636
avatar
IBM Response
10y
Thanks for sharing your experience, and we're glad that you've had a positive experience working with talented colleagues and taking advantage of IBM's programs. IBM is in the midst of a major transformation, --our Systems business is going through its own changes to strengthen competitiveness. Change is never easy. As part of our transformation, we just launched a whole new approach for how we are coaching employees, delivering feedback and managing reviews. No distribution guidelines or what some think of as 'stacked rankings." What's particularly great is that this was co-designed with our employee base from all over the world... to the tune of hundreds of thousands of page views, comments, on-line debates and discussions. IBMers even named the new system Checkpoint, to reflect the regular feedback rituals we're adopting. Managers are more empowered with the new methodology to help them acknowledge the great work of their teams and help their employees develop professionally. These steps and more are showing up in our employee surveys as well. So IBMers are feeling the change. We are confident these changes will help us in continuing to attract and retain great talent.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All