Pros
Strong brand, big budgets, and real scale. Many talented coworkers; in some pockets, the work can be genuinely interesting
Cons
The default assumption is low trust: everything is gated, approved, escalated, and re-approved. Ownership and speed die in process. “Policy” and “compliance” often function as convenient blockers - strict when it protects hierarchy, flexible when it benefits leadership. Initiative is praised in slogans but discouraged in practice once it crosses invisible power lines. Career growth is opaque and sponsor-driven; optics and narrative frequently beat consistent impact. There is little real care for the smallest workers in the org - especially the people doing hands-on, backbone tasks that keep operations stable. Many of these roles are staffed through third parties, and compensation can be shockingly low for the responsibility involved - sometimes lower than basic on-site service roles. Reorgs are sold as transformation, but on the ground it often looks like manager reshuffling. Incentives and bottlenecks stay the same. From an employee perspective, top leadership is either being fed a filtered reality or prioritizing optics - either way, culture doesn’t change