The Gift & The Curse of Large Corporation Employment - Supplier Quality Engineer Northrop Grumman Employee Review

3.0
8 June 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

**Great work-life balance (9/80 Schedule - every other Friday off) **Large Corporation - plenty of employee discounts (movie tickets), perks & an on-site cafeteria (some what expensive, but convenient) **Opportunity to work with cutting-edge technology (radar, space, etc.), with some very talented people across functions

Cons

**Nepotism - you have to be very careful with whom you rub the wrong way (could be the spouse, uncle, or cousin of someone in your organizational hierarchy) **Career Advancement - the progression of your career can be an uphill battle unless you have an individual of influence backing you **Competitive Pay - pay is not always up to par compared to what other companies pay for a similar position, it seems that they may hide behind the glamour and glitz of being such a large, well-known corporation

Explore other reviews about Northrop Grumman

5.0
29 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible work arrangement, 9/80 schedule, job security

Cons

Low pay, full time on site required for career growth

1.0
11 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Not much pros but talented coworkers.

Cons

I joined expecting a long-term career and initially had a positive experience. Unfortunately, the culture changed significantly after leadership transitions. Micromanagement increased, decision-making became highly centralized, and employee morale steadily declined. Many experienced employees and managers left during my time there, making it difficult to maintain continuity and trust within the organization. The work itself was meaningful, and I had the opportunity to support important projects with talented colleagues. However, recognition, career growth, and employee retention did not appear to receive the same level of attention as process, reporting, and management oversight. My layoff was communicated as unrelated to performance, which was appreciated. However, after years of contribution and institutional knowledge, the overall experience left me feeling that employees were viewed as replaceable rather than valued long-term assets.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All