Merit Pay Is Possible, But Expect to Work Long Hours - Project Manager Northrop Grumman Employee Review

4.0
31 Jan 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible working hours. Varied job opportunities. High achievers/perfomers can reap significantl merit raises. Employees are accessible and very willing to share information and lessons learned on projects. Employees can seek training virtually, via in-house seminars or via formal courses at colleges/universities.

Cons

Expect to work over 90 hours per pay period. Human Resources is very tight-lipped on compensation range for one's current position. For me, starting salary/compensation was non-negotiable where company appeared to have an arrognant attitude. Employees have to remember they are expendable and have to ensure they are marketable by taking advantage of training opportunties..

Explore other reviews about Northrop Grumman

5.0
24 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Steady work environment with security

Cons

Opportunities to progress career is limited

1.0
11 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Not much pros but talented coworkers.

Cons

I joined expecting a long-term career and initially had a positive experience. Unfortunately, the culture changed significantly after leadership transitions. Micromanagement increased, decision-making became highly centralized, and employee morale steadily declined. Many experienced employees and managers left during my time there, making it difficult to maintain continuity and trust within the organization. The work itself was meaningful, and I had the opportunity to support important projects with talented colleagues. However, recognition, career growth, and employee retention did not appear to receive the same level of attention as process, reporting, and management oversight. My layoff was communicated as unrelated to performance, which was appreciated. However, after years of contribution and institutional knowledge, the overall experience left me feeling that employees were viewed as replaceable rather than valued long-term assets.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All