Very Unstable - Development Editor Pearson Employee Review

1.0
1 June 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Very good benefits if you are permanent (not term-of-project) Some good colleagues OK pay compared to some areas of publishing at small firms Fall Fridays ( as opposed to summer Fridays)

Cons

Most employees are term-of-project, so not permanent. Our contracts were all due to expire on December 31st. We heard nothing, meaning that we did not know whether to come to work on January 1st. We did come in, only to receive our letters renewing employment a few days later. People had not known whether they could afford to travel home for the vacation or how much they could spend on presents, due to the uncertainty of the job. If you are permanent, you receive a bonus of many thousands of dollars. I was kept term-of-project, only to find out that someone with over a decade less experience than me - that is, only a couple of years of experience post-college, someone very young - had been made permanent, and then specifically told not to tell me. In addition, I had to have surgery and was told that Pearson would not pay me for the time I was off recovering, because I was term-of-project, despite two years of flawless mistake-free service and long hours from me. If you are just out of college, joining any Pearson company is a superb start, even if it's Pearson Learning Solutions. But if you have over two years post-college experience, this place is more likely to hold you back than do you any favors.

Explore other reviews about Pearson

5.0
23 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Wonderful Environment, and excellent benefits. Great work life balance. Great incentive bonuses.

Cons

Limited Overtime available to increase profits,

2.0
11 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

When a project goes according to plan you can work with some great people and make decent money.

Cons

Bad behavior is tolerated when you have a weak team member. They are allowed to remain on payroll, even if they do not effectively contribute. The burden is often placed on the team members willing to pick up the slack. Promotions are not given to the most qualified. They are randomly assigned. There are some horrible scoring directors as a result.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All