LRN Reviews

3.8

80% would recommend to a friend

(410 total reviews)
avatar

Kevin Michielsen

80% approve of CEO

75% positive business outlook

LRN has an employee rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 410 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The LRN employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

410 reviews
1.0
6 July 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The CEO pressured staff to post a favorable review here (as he's done with so many others). Now that I've left, here's the truth: 1. Excluding the sycophantic leadership team, the people here are really nice. 2. Spacious offices in good locations. It’s like Ikea, but with a lot of recently emptied-out desks. 3. Working at LRN will actually allow you to not only read Orwellian literature like Animal Farm, but actually experience it first-hand, like you're actually living the book from the inside - as part of an experiential immersion exercise! 4. If you work in LA there’s flexibility around working from home. The CEO is actually against this policy, so this doesn’t apply to NY. Because there are arbitrary, different rules for different people here. Reflecting on the literature noted in my 2nd point above, this quote from that book is apropos: "All [people] are equal, but some [people] are more equal than others." 5. Job seekers reading about LRN on Glassdoor: if you join, you will soon have the opportunity to go ‘through the looking glass’ and post about Glassdoor yourself. Either because the CEO pressured you to do so or because you've left and feel it is your moral obligation to warn others.

Cons

Please note: Many of the effusively positive, strangely jargon-heavy posts on this site are made under duress from the CEO. I know because I once had to do one. I'll explain... Imagine for a second you're working at a private organization (that many other Glassdoor posts accurately describe as 'cult-like') with an all-powerful CEO/Owner. Everyone is scared of him. He 'disappears' people he doesn’t like from the organization all the time. When he's nearby, it's sort of like Darth Vader is standing behind you. That is actually what his presence feels like. However, he's obsessed with his public persona. Although people flee in droves (8 months is the average attrition rate for people working in the main office at LRN), he's figured out that when you control the official Soviet state messaging, produce tons of PR to dilute all the negative reports, and dismiss the comments of all dissenters because 'a revolution is not for everyone' ...then you can cover up what it's really like behind the iron curtain and get people to continue to emigrate. This is LRN, Comrade. High-five! Now imagine, that one day the scary CEO pulls you aside, looms over you and says: "All these people are posting bad things about the company on the website. Tonight I need you to ‘volunteer’ to go and post a review sharing all the good things about the real company!" (Implicit in this voluntary activity: The CEO will be checking it and viewing what you wrote as a loyalty test). Ahem: "This work was strictly voluntary, but any [person] who absented himself from it would have his rations reduced by half."] So imagine this happened - what would you do? What we all do. We keep our jobs. This exact scenario has happened to so many people. Please take that into account. Because it happens. A lot. This post is my real review. Other extra awesome bonus features of working at LRN: > The endlessly referenced 'mission' of the company (to make businesses more ethical), which may be a factor for why you want to work here, is totally inaccurate and misleading. The real mission is to be a PR agency for the CEO. This wouldn't be problematic if you were working for a Kardashian and knew what you were hired to do. In this case it is soul-crushing because the CEO you are championing is worse than a misplaced focal point for your ethics PR efforts; once you work closely with him you realize he's actually the opposite of who should be the face of this movement. He has what's known as the "Dark Triad" of personality characteristics. So, if you care about business being more ethical, ironically by working here you may come to feel like you're undermining that end goal. Example: imagine if you worked at an organization that claimed it's committed to making sure people get enough vitamin D. But instead of just distributing vitamin D, you spend all your time booking this CEO guy for articles and at speaking events so he can talk about how he's some nutrition messiah who's figured out the world needs more vitamin D. After speaking, he hands out some t-shirts with his picture on it and some 'proprietary' LRN pills, supposed to boost vitamin D. (Note: These pills have not been proven to contain any vitamin D.) That’s sorta what it’s like. Ask yourself, how many years of your life are you willing to commit to that? > The interview process feels like a bait n' switch where whenever you ask what you will be doing, you will be repeatedly told 'there are no titles at LRN' - then you will be hired for a very discrete, prescribed role which is actually a demotion. (Yay!) >You will be underpaid. The not-so-secret business advantage about "not having any titles" is that no titles means no salary bands and no way to benchmark yourself against the industry for what, say, an IT manager should make. No titles also means no such thing as a promotion - even when your role or responsibilities considerably expand. The CEO reflexively low-balls everyone on salary. Ironically, most of the money gets routed back to the CEO, like when he funnels company money towards buying hundreds of thousands of copies of his own book to artificially boost its sales numbers. (Remember, this is the guy you will be spending most of your time promoting as the face of the corporate ethics movement). > All decisions bottleneck at the CEO because he's a micro-manager (or as he normally says "I'm just micro-interested"). The organization is not flat – as it claims to be. Which reminds me of this: "No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all [people] are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?" > On at least a monthly basis you will be berated publicly by the CEO for not working hard enough for 'the mission'. Not for any particular reason. Just because you were nearby and he decided to 'interact' with you. He has 2 modes of one-on-one interaction: jokey bullying vs. scary intimidation whilst citing your inadequacy and reminding you how disappointing you are. (This is not surprising, as there is almost always an overlap between Corporate_narcissism and workplace bullying) > If you are an optimistic person committed to social good, after working here you'll probably leave a much more skeptical and jaded person about organizations in general. That's what happens when you take a pay cut to work on a meaningful social issue and then discover it's a big snow job.

2.0
24 July 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some really terrific, bright employees here. The rank and file employees here are the best part of LRN. A really fantastic group of smart, humble, hard-working, and thoughtful people who lean in every day. The NY/LA offices are aesthetically pleasing and in a good location. Here’s a handy decision tree for you… + + “You should consider accepting a job at LRN IF the following four factors apply:” + + #1. If your starting salary is acceptable. LRN is open about the fact that it pays under market. Knowing you'll never get a *significant* raise - even if your responsibilities *drastically* expand, you need to be happy with your day 1 starting salary. #2. If you are not looking to be able to demonstrate career advancement at this stage in your professional life - and are comfortable having an extended ‘plateau period’ on your resume where you don’t receive a promotion (even if your responsibilities drastically expand). #3. If you will be working remotely in your role. If not remotely, if you are *not* working in the primary office where the CEO works (he creates an oppressive cloud of unease wherever he goes). #4. If you have a high tolerance for hypocrisy and can shrug off periodic loyalty tests. ...if the conditions listed above are true, then a role at LRN might be a good option for you! Caveat: if your role involves you working closely with the CEO... Do not take the job! It's not worth it. He is manic, has zero empathy or boundaries and thinks nothing of expecting 24/7 (really, 10pm on a saturday) support from employees - offering nothing in the way of rewards or even genuine appreciation. This is a guy who has gone through so many secretaries that he had to change the secretaries' email to 'assistant_to_the_Ceo' to mask the revolving door of people quitting because he was so unpleasant to work for. Seriously. If the job involves working closely with him – I’d strongly counsel you not to take it. + + A note about the reviews on Glassdoor:+ + So you’ve made it to Glassdoor. You may have noticed a trend where reviews are either negative or gushingly positive. You might be confused about which to believe. While I was at LRN, the CEO initiated active campaigns to get employees to post on Glassdoor to dilute the tide of negative posts (which should be a red flag given LRN’s focus on culture, transparency and behavior). The glowing reviews? In my case, mid-campaign he pulled me aside personally and told me to go “be inspired” and “post a review tonight on Glassdoor sharing the real LRN”. Of course, the subtext is explicit: he expected me to post something that night, he would be reading it later and attributing it to me, and the effusive positivity of my post would a loyalty test demonstrating my commitment to LRN and its “mission”. I know of other posts made under similar guidance/duress. Need another example? Check out the ‘reviews’ of his HOW book on Amazon. 2/3rds of the reviews come from LRN employees – who were similarly ‘strongly encouraged’ to write 5 star reviews (despite the fact that doing so violates Amazon’s review guidelines). Get used to this shady approach to PR & reputation management because that’s how LRN creates buzz. And spoiler alert: this is what the term ‘inspiration’ will become skewed to signify once you work at LRN. Look, you’ve come this far… If you are planning on joining LRN and spending 2+ years here, you owe yourself the due diligence to find out if these things people are saying on Glassdoor are true. SO: use your LinkedIn network and find a *former* employee of LRN and reach out and ask them. Current employees are often too scared of retaliation to be honest with a stranger. People have been fired (from the LA office at least) when the story got out that they were too candid (not even vindictive, just frank) in interviews. Find someone who used to work here - and get the real story.

Cons

The thing you need to realize about this company is that the culture is 100% a manifestation of the CEO’s personality, operational ineptitude, and unstated narcissistic agenda. The company is privately owned by the CEO and he installed a weak board. He is pretty much all-powerful (the Executive Committee is just a shadow governance body that acts as the ‘hand of the king’ to provide the illusion he is not acting autocratically). You may have read the CEOs book or seen a speech and found it inspiring. We all did. The important thing to realize is that the CEO has two different faces. With a crowd, he can be gracious, humble, reflective and open to other perspectives. In large public speaking settings he seems to match the company philosophy; and seems to be reasonable and fair. You are likely to encounter his 'public face' in any group conversation where there are more than 8 listeners, outside customers, or if he’s talking to someone of influence who he needs to ingratiate himself to. However, if you work at LRN – sooner or later you encounter *the real* CEO in a smaller meeting. The real CEO is autocratic, abrasive, inflexible, retaliatory, stingy, bereft of empathy for employee well-being, and operates off of a coercive ‘my way or the highway’ type management style cloaked in whatever principles are convenient to justify his ends. He perpetually gives lip-service to his big ‘HOW’ ideas, but his default personal style and psychological tendencies are in direct conflict with those ideas… and the default psychological tendencies (manipulative and cultish) always win. If he was to write a business book that *really* reflected how he operates, it would be called “Leverage: Get More from Your Employees via Coercion Repackaged as Principle.” Also, do not buy the repeated internal refrain about ‘LRN is on a journey’. Whenever serious problems are brought up, the CEO responds ‘LRN is on a journey, we’re frank about the fact that we’re not there yet’. However, that metaphor is way of failing to take accountability. Once recast in narrative terms, *every* person and organization is on a journey. What matters is if the real issues are truly addressed or are they just given lip-service or toothless internal initiatives to airbrush concerns. LRN is good at making a convincing show at contrition, and will prop up reform initiatives that are just real enough to seem like they’re working on it, but the truth is – all the biggest roadblocks stem from the CEO. His managerial mandates create the operational low-ceiling that suffocates the business and keeps LRN from truly flourishing. Ultimately, the real ‘journey’ that LRN is on, is endlessly circling the CEO’s neurosis. There is always movement, but never progress; the organization cannot escape the event horizon of his pathology … it just orbits around and around in a frantic circle of attrition and reinvention.

1.0
16 Aug 2015

Like Kool-Aid? You'll love it here!

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

If you lament that you missed out on the Branch Davidians, Jonestown, or Heaven's Gate, now's your time to get in on the fun at LRN! A company originally started with a good idea (and still has a good product), all the pros of working here are completely outweighed by the crazytown cult-like nepotistic culture and the inflated egos.

Cons

Ok, so before you say "Oh, but LRN's ratings are good!" and "How could those negative reviews be true? It can't be THAT bad...", Yes, it can be THAT bad and it IS that bad. And those positive reviews? About as authentic as a hotdog made in China. Yes, they're written by real people, but let it be known that management took measures to coerce positive reviews out of employees that would make the Mafia proud. Leave the review, take the cannoli. (Or rather leave the review, keep your job.) Also, this is not the first time that management has done this. So how does a company rack up a *stellar* turnover rate of well-over 50%? Why 50% Leave: 1) Management: The CEO has a maniacal way of dealing with not just the business but also interpersonally with employees and with his own personal brand. Who knew you could trademark (and sue over misuse of) the word "How"?! He is incredibly difficult to work for as he is quick to find fault in everything people do and you never know how he'll react to something. He seems to liken himself a philosopher, but if that's true, I'm sure Socrates and Kant are somewhere shaking their head and saying "No way, dude... Don't associate us with that drama." Being demanding and irrational is the status-quo, with the CEO requiring that his employees have a cult-like dedication to "the mission" and that a work-life balance isn't deserved by all. Is he intelligent? Yes. Is he a good public speaker? Yes. Did he have a good premise in starting LRN 20 years ago? Yes. But does any of that come into play with the way he interacts and conducts things at LRN now? Absolutely not. However, much of the current condition of the company comes from the "shakeup" and the hiring of a new president in December of 2014. (Actually, the hiring of a new 2nd president as they had already hired a president earlier in 2014. But this is referencing the second hire, whom we'll call "President Deux".) President Deux's display of arrogance is evident as he overpromises and under-delivers and shamelessly nepotisms the crap out LRN's hiring practices. Systematically (and unceremoniously) axing quite a number of great (existing) employees who have a laundry list of incredible professional insight and experience, he's brought in an entire new team from his previous place of employment, some of which, although amiable and undoubtedly smart, wouldn't normally have been hired due to their inexperience in their current responsibilities if it wasn't for this cronyism. However, even the Benjamins and blatant favoritism can't sustain people amid this dysfunction, and just a few months in, members of Team Nepotism are already jumping ship. Many want off the HMS LRN, as the way it's currently running is the same way the Titanic was steered through the icebergs, and management is blindly yelling "Full steam ahead!" 2) Dysfunction Junction: Remember how ridiculous the theory was that the world was flat a few centuries ago? Well a flat organization is just as ridiculous at a company like LRN. There are too many insecure people making decisions that are merely self-serving to make "flat" work. Between the mood swings and diva-like behavior of management, the insecurities of management make them get rid of good people and many of the more established staff are always fearful (through no fault of their own) that they may not have a job next month. Or next week. Or after lunch. Similar to some of the elements mentioned above, this "ethics" company is by far the most unethical place I've worked and even heard about. They talk about transparency but they're about as transparent as the Hudson River. Well, let me clarify-- they love to throw people under the bus, find scapegoats, etc. They'll be transparent if they can humiliate someone, make it look like someone did something wrong, or take the pressure off of their own mistakes or failure to produce. However, they make false promises when they hire people, ranging from deception about career growth, to company culture/workplace happiness, to contract negotiations (get EVERYTHING in writing) and everything in between. 3) There is NO career growth opportunity here both because of the flat structure and the culture. They have no interest in investing in their employees/ Why People Stay: 1) Great location. Nice bright office. 2) Free Snacks....But seriously, are free Herr's Pretzels and Raisins something really worth selling your soul for? Of course not. Nacho Doritos and Twizzlers, maybe. But definitely not off-brand pretzels and dried fruit. Moral of the story: Being one of the most unethical ethics companies, the hypocrisy is almost comedic. Don't believe the empty promises of this company-- there is no growth opportunity, there is no real revolutionary new stage of LRN that you'll be a part of, and the culture could be considered by many to be downright toxic. Favoritism and insecurity is palpable. (Unless you worked with the president at his previous company, good luck. You don't exist. You will not be respected, encouraged, or supported.). However, you will be required to be committed to "going forward" and "the mission." So if, despite this and the numerous other candid reviews on Glassdoor, you're still up for going forward on "the mission", don't worry about bringing supplies as you'll have your choice of free snacks and of course, the drinks are included, as long as you like Kool-Aid.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 410 Reviews

Glassdoor has 446 LRN reviews submitted anonymously by LRN employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if LRN is right for you.