employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Western Financial Group

Engaged employer

Reviews by job title

69 reviews
1.0
20 May 2026

Run while you can

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Co-workers and frontline staff are great and collaborative.

Cons

There is a growing perception that senior leadership is managing the organization through fear and intimidation rather than support and collaboration. Expectations from top leadership focus heavily on achieving results at any cost, yet employees are not being provided with the guidance, resources, stability, or direction needed to succeed. While the Executive Leadership Team is sizable, it appears split between individuals who unquestioningly support decisions and others who may privately disagree but feel unable to challenge leadership out of concern for their own roles or the impact on their teams. In some cases, leadership dynamics have begun to resemble an exclusionary inner circle, where alignment and loyalty appear to be valued more highly than constructive discussion, professional respect, or differing perspectives. This has contributed to a culture where employees feel pressured to conform rather than speak openly. The CEO frequently encourages transparency and open feedback; however, these messages are undermined by actions that seem to discourage honest dialogue. Employees who have spoken candidly or offered differing perspectives have repeatedly exited the organization, creating a strong perception that dissent is not truly welcomed. This disconnect between leadership messaging and leadership actions, combined with ongoing dismissals of senior leaders and larger groups of employees, has severely damaged trust throughout the company. Increasingly, employees do not view these changes as legitimate restructuring efforts, but rather as targeted actions, leading to widespread anxiety about job security. At the same time, teams continue to face intense pressure to achieve goals that many believe are unrealistic. Even when objectives are met, expectations continue to increase, leaving employees with little sense of recognition, accomplishment, or stability. Sustaining morale and motivating teams under these conditions is becoming increasingly difficult.

3.0
5 May 2026

Company’s Leadership needs to be re-evaluated

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I used to have a lot of pros, but not anymore.

Cons

I’ve been with this company for over 10 years, and it’s incredibly disappointing to see what it has become. For most of my time here, it was a place built on strong leadership, trust, and genuinely talented people who cared about their work and each other. Since the new CEO stepped in, the culture has shifted dramatically—and not for the better. Decisions feel driven more by ego than by strategy, and there’s been a noticeable lack of transparency and respect for the people who have helped build this company. Talented, dedicated employees are being let go with little justification, and it’s hard not to feel like these moves are more about control than necessity. What’s most concerning is the atmosphere this has created. Morale is at an all-time low. People are no longer focused on doing great work—they’re focused on whether they’ll still have a job tomorrow. That kind of fear-based environment is not sustainable and certainly not how you retain or attract good people. It’s frustrating because this company had so much potential. I hope leadership takes a step back and recognizes the impact these decisions are having before more damage is done.

1.0
16 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are not a lot anymore.

Cons

The culture at this company is toxic from the very top. The CEO and his inner circle are the source of most of the dysfunction, fear, and burnout across the organization. They have surrounded themselves with “yes people” who protect each other while the rest of the company pays the price. This is not a company where employees matter. People are viewed as completely expendable resources to be pushed harder, blamed faster, and replaced when they burn out. The expectation is endless work, endless pressure, and if you disagree with sr leadership you’re our. Every restructuring or reduction simply means fewer people being forced to absorb even more work, while leadership continues demanding higher output with less support and fewer resources. Employees are worked into the ground while being told they still are not doing enough. There is no psychological safety, no trust, and no authenticity left in the culture. Sr Leadership only wants agreement and obedience. If something does not fit the narrative Senior Leadership wants told, it gets ignored, buried, or the employee speaking up becomes the problem. Fear drives everything here. Good employees who challenge decisions, raise legitimate concerns, or try to advocate for their teams are pushed out, sidelined, or terminated, while toxic leaders continue to fail upward as long as they stay loyal to the executive circle. The message is very clear: stay quiet, protect leadership, and fall in line — or you become expendable too. What is especially frustrating is how disconnected sr leadership is from the damage they are causing. While employees are drowning under impossible workloads, constant pressure, and collapsing morale, leadership seems focused on optics, politics, protecting each other, and hitting bonus targets while patting each other on the back. Decisions are made based on ego, image, and executive self-interest — not people, not culture, and not long-term business health. The leadership table has become an echo chamber where toxic behaviour, political games, and questionable business practices are protected and rewarded as long as the right people benefit and the numbers look good on paper. Meanwhile, good employees are exhausted, disengaged, and leaving because they are tired of being treated as disposable. This company does not have a people-first culture despite what leadership says publicly. It has a leadership-first culture where employees exist to absorb pressure so executives can protect their image and compensation.

1.0
13 Apr 2026

Core values = Lies

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

They HAD a vision to care about their employees. When that was important to them, they were incredible. Employees wanted to do more, culture improved, and people felt supported.

Cons

With the new CEO & senior management, the direction is now to become a call centre, work people into the ground, offer no support, and motivate by fear. The pay is nowhere near what it should be, there is no training for new staff, and the culture is now bullying. I would not recommend Western for any reason.

avatar
Western Financial Group Response
1mo
Thank you for sharing your feedback. Our core values including showing care, being accountable, empowering others, and focusing on continuous improvement guide how we strive to support our people and serve our communities. We recognize that periods of change can be challenging, and experiences can vary. While we cannot comment on specific situations in a public forum, we take feedback seriously. We appreciate those who take the time to share their perspectives, as honest feedback helps us continue to evolve.
1.0
15 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are many dedicated, capable people across the business who genuinely care about the culture and work hard to support their teams. Front line employees and leaders remain committed despite increasingly difficult expectations and working conditions.

Cons

At the senior leadership level, the company is operating through fear and intimidation. The messaging directly from top leadership is for the expectation of success at all costs, but with no support, guidance, resources or steady direction. While the ELT is large, it appears divided between those who comply without question, and those who, understandably concerned for their own positions or those of their teams, are unwilling to challenge decisions - even when those decisions are damaging. Repeated requests for open feedback and transparency by the CEO are directly contradicted by actions that appear punitive toward those known for speaking candidly, as we have seen the repeated exits of those who were known for sharing differing opinions, especially senior female leaders. This inconsistency of messaging, coupled with constant firing of both senior leaders and large groups of employees, has significantly eroded trust across many areas of the business. We no longer believe that these decisions are from a ‘restructure’ – they seem targeted and we are all worried we are next. We are under immense pressure to meet goals that are widely perceived as unrealistic. Even when targets are achieved, the bar is continually raised, leaving little sense of accomplishment or recognition. It is becoming impossible to motivate teams in this environment.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 69 Reviews

Glassdoor has 404 Western Financial Group reviews submitted anonymously by Western Financial Group employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Western Financial Group is right for you.