Google's great. Recruiting needs work. - Recruiter Google Employee Review

4.0
30 Sept 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

It's Google! It really is fantastic. Perks, benefits, and people are all excellent! Super smart and capable people in recruiting that are being massively under-utilized. If you have a good manager who advocates for your work, you'll be fine.

Cons

Politics, especially around promotion. Popularity and project work is more valued than real performance. As a result, you have recruiters who do a lot of projects, evangelize their work, and "teach to the test" re: personal metrics, but they do not provide an authentic experience to candidates and clients. But because they're more visible, they get rewarded. And if your boss's boss's boss barely knows who you are, forget it. Promotion is a game and you have to know the right people. Newer employees are wildly under-leveled. As a result you have 32-year-old new employees who are at a lower level than 26-year-olds who have been with Google for a few years. It's so strange, and I've never seen anything like it. Tracking systems are poor. Leadership's been here forever, so not a lot of innovative thinking or perspective. Almost all of senior leadership in Staffing is Google-grown, so it's a massive echo chamber.

Explore other reviews about Google

5.0
12 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

good environment to work in

Cons

no cons, i loved the job

4.0
21 June 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1) Food, food, food. 15+ cafes on main campus (MTV) alone. Mini-kitchens, snacks, drinks, free breakfast/lunch/dinner, all day, errr'day. 2) Benefits/perks. Free 24:7 gym access (on MTV campus). Free (self service) laundry (washer/dryer) available. Bowling alley. Volley ball pit. Custom-built and exclusive employee use only outdoor sport park (MTV). Free health/fitness assessments. Dog-friendly. Etc. etc. etc. 3) Compensation. In ~2010 or 2011, Google updated its compensation packages so that they were more competitive. 4) For the size of the organization (30K+), it has remained relatively innovative, nimble, and fast-paced and open with communication but, that is definitely changing (for the worse). 5) With so many departments, focus areas, and products, *in theory*, you should have plenty of opportunity to grow your career (horizontally or vertically). In practice, not true. 6) You get to work with some of the brightest, most innovative and hard-working/diligent minds in the industry. There's a "con" to that, too (see below).

Cons

1) Work/life balance. What balance? All those perks and benefits are an illusion. They keep you at work and they help you to be more productive. I've never met anybody at Google who actually time off on weekends or on vacations. You may not hear management say, "You have to work on weekends/vacations" but, they set the culture by doing so - and it inevitably trickles down. I don't know if Google inadvertently hires the work-a-holics or if they create work-a-holics in us. Regardless, I have seen way too many of the following: marriages fall apart, colleagues choosing work and projects over family, colleagues getting physically sick and ill because of stress, colleagues crying while at work because of the stress, colleagues shooting out emails at midnight, 1am, 2am, 3am. It is absolutely ridiculous and something needs to change. 2) Poor management. I think the issue is that, a majority of people love Google because they get to work on interesting technical problems - and these are the people that see little value in learning how to develop emotional intelligence. Perhaps they enjoy technical problems because people are too "difficult." People are promoted into management positions - not because they actually know how to lead/manage, but because they happen to be smart or because there is no other path to grow into. So there is a layer of intelligent individuals who are horrible managers and leaders. Yet, there is no value system to actually do anything about that because "emotional intelligence" or "adaptive leadership" are not taken seriously. 3) Jerks. Sure, there are a lot of brilliant people - but, sadly, there are also a lot of jerks (and, many times, they are one and the same). Years ago, that wasn't the case. I don't know if the pool of candidates is getting smaller, or maybe all the folks with great personalities cashed out and left, or maybe people are getting burned out and it's wearing on their personality and patience. I've heard stories of managers straight-up cussing out their employees and intimidating/scaring their employees into compliance. 4) It's a giant company now and, inevitably, it has become slower moving and is now layered with process and bureaucracy. So many political battles, empire building, territory grabbing. Google says, "Don't be evil." But, that practice doesn't seem to be put into place when it comes to internal practices. :(

3865
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All