Decide what you really want to be as a company - Principal Infosys Employee Review

2.0
27 Jan 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You can leverage the experience to work someplace else. There are so many shifting priorities on a almost daily basis. Yu are to develop meaningful collateral, however, if you do not help or directly sell any work, your collateral is meaningless. You work with career counselor who are directed to help find assignments , however, they have no input as to reviews and are worthless when you ask direct questions as to direction and priorities.

Cons

Mixed messages as to expectations of job performance and goals. Senior management has so many shifting priorities that the messages to employees are not at all consistent. They also tend to shed workers that are working on revenue generating projects simply to reduce head count. They cannot see the forest because the trees are in the way. They have very little proactive thinking and every changing priority is at the highest level.

Explore other reviews about Infosys

5.0
11 May 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good company to work with

Cons

growth may be factor to consider

4.0
10 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Cons

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All