Good place to work for people who expect predictable and challenge free life. Not much learning opportunities. - Technical Lead Infosys Employee Review

3.0
14 Jan 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Predictable work schedule; less challenges at work; lot of overheads in internal process so you are mostly not accountable for anything.

Cons

Since less challenges at work, no learning. Lot of internal process overhead, so management always keeps policies in their favor. For example, if custom seizes your official laptop while international travel, Infosys will deduct the cost from your salary. You are a salaried worker when it comes to terms of salary. If client has more than 10 holidays for any reason, you will be forcibly made to take one day leave (here you are treated like a contractor). Employees are treated like resource and not like people. Numbers matters instead of quality.

Explore other reviews about Infosys

5.0
27 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Management Resources Work life Balance

Cons

Pay and benefits could be better

4.0
10 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Cons

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All