Fake work environment, forced happiness. - Account Executive LinkedIn Employee Review

1.0
22 Feb 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Canteen, Benefits, Building, Supportive teams (cleaning, security is amazing)

Cons

Very bad attitude towards employees from middle management. Tasks are up on the air, no really commitment, no progression, no career path, no recognition, a lot of push backs. The worst part is the fake workplace. Forced fun activities, fake spiffs, tasks are done just to be done. Nothing is sincere, people are looking to do the daily task and leave. Completely acting against its values and when you ask about those values the response is the bullying. HR doesn't want to involve in anything, it is all managers decision. Firing people just before their probation period ends withouth any explanation. And extending probations is a trend now. HR is constantly sharing anonymous feedback about employees to the management secretly. Nothing is kept confidential. Favouritism is the key to success. Over looking managers and harassing acts are welcomed. I can't understand how it became that bad and unwanted in the last couple of years. Real bad example of employer branding. Real disappointment.

Explore other reviews about LinkedIn

5.0
4 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Working on great problems with real impact to the members.

Cons

On-call sometimes is annoying. Care too much about the titles rather and sometimes that blocks career progress.

3.0
21 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Control your schedule -Office environment is great -Teammates are nice and helpful

Cons

-Customer Success metrics lack clear ownership and actionable levers. Many CSMs do not have direct control over the outcomes they are measured against, and success narratives are often based on isolated or non-replicable examples rather than scalable processes. -Microsoft’s increased influence over LinkedIn has led to tighter promotion structures and more limited compensation growth pathways. -Product value within the LTS portfolio is inconsistent. LinkedIn Learning struggles with perceived differentiation and impact, while Recruiter’s market position relies heavily on legacy dominance rather than clear ongoing innovation or customer value expansion. -Metric design and performance management frameworks were created without a strong operational understanding of the CSM role, resulting in accountability for outcomes that CSMs cannot directly influence. -While many CSMs share these concerns, there is limited upward feedback or structured challenge to leadership regarding metric design and role effectiveness, which limits opportunities for meaningful reform. They prefer to lick the boots of senior leaders rather than tell AV and his team how they actually feel and see progress to better, more impactful metrics. For individuals who are comfortable with high call volumes (10+ customer interactions per week) and performance metrics that are influenced significantly by external factors rather than direct role ownership, LinkedIn LTS Customer Success can be a suitable environment.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All