Typical mature, product run company - Anonymous employee PayPal Employee Review

3.0
30 Sept 2016
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

* Pay * 401k matching * ESPP * Onsite gym * Dominate player in the payments space

Cons

* Not very diverse * If you're not on the "right" ethnicity, you could have a hard time succeeding * Not a technology company, MBA run * To much "fat" * Lots of unnecessary layers of mgmt * Even after moving to an agile model, things still move slowly * "Bad" employees aren't purged, instead, they're just moved to another team

avatar
PayPal Response
9y
Thank you for the feedback. We are in the process of our end of year performance reviews and have done work to ensure we have consistent definitions of performance expectations to help support managers in evaluating talent and identifying our very best and those individuals who may not be a fit for PayPal. This is a process that will take time, but I feel confident that we are taking the right steps to address the concerns you’ve raised. Thank you for the valuable feedback.

Explore other reviews about PayPal

5.0
7 May 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good work life balance. Lot of opportunities to learn

Cons

Company is in transition mode

2.0
13 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

PayPal has a lot of potential. It has two very strong brands in PayPal and Venmo with significant awareness and user bases that other companies envy. There are pockets of teams that are really pushing the envelop to reimagine what PayPal and Venmo could be—especially the Venmo team—and to move with speed given the company must stay focused and not waste time with Apple Pay, Shop Pay, and so many other competitors nipping at PayPal's heels and aggressively taking market share.

Cons

While some teams are pushing to self-disrupt and are moving fast, too many teams—and I'd argue the majority of the company–are living off of PayPal's laurels from the late 2010s through the pandemic. The culture and mindset have to change for the company to remain competitive. Otherwise, they are the Titanic and they're sinking slowly. The former CEO who only last 2 years tried diversifying the company's revenue, planning for the future. But the board and its former chairman (now new CEO) felt he wasn't moving fast enough to stabilize and marketshare. Instead, the board hired the former chairman who made computers and printers at HP—another sinking ship—to lead the oldest fintech company. The loss of confidence in the leadership team and the strategy are only accelerating.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All