Sinking (shiny) Ship - Anonymous employee Tripadvisor Employee Review

1.0
1 Feb 2016
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Free lunch. Honestly, everyone lists the free lunch as one of the few things good about TripAdvisor. Consider how meaningless a "pro" this is.

Cons

TripAdvisor benefits from an advantage of having more content than it's competitors. Not only will this advantage not last forever, but the company risks having it's lunch eaten by another player using TripAdvisor's own API to display it's content in a more useful, relevant manner. The executives at TripAdvisor are more interested in muddling feature on top of feature, than they are in settting a reasonable and innovative strategy and improving their existing product. But culture eats strategy for breakfast, and the culture at TripAdvisor is breathtakingly saccharine, selfish, and void of anything approaching professional development or learning. "Speed wins" at TripAdvisor, which means any opportunity to learn, to grow, to succeed in something other than a wildly thrown together mess, loses. Speed wins so much that the code base is a mess, left to engineering to deal with (or run away from), and that sales can't even keep up with the new functionality. And that new functionality roadmap? Doesn't come from the users. TripAdvisor could not possibly be any less user-centered. Product Managers rule the roost here, and their idea of engaging user feedback is a/b testing, and only a/b testing. Meanwhile, customer service is fielding thousands of complaints, but are put in the impossible position of either not being familiar with the (often new and fleeting) functionality, or having to just file a bug with existing functionality that has little hope of ever getting fixed. The supposed quality control of the PMs is "Product Review," in which 30 people glued to their laptops, sit around a table, only to momentarily perk up 2 hours into the meeting when their spec is presented. But hey, FREE LUNCH!

avatar
Tripadvisor Response
10y
Wow, I'm surprised to have such an unhappy employee, and I would be happy to chat in person about this as well. Let me try to explain my thinking on the points you raise. Content licensing: We license our content (a few reviews or snippets) to help propel our brand. We don't license all of our reviews to anyone (that I can think of). So while the API is helpful to many companies, and we have hundreds (if not thousands) of license partners, we love the fact that they are helping us build our global brand. I acknowledge that there is a risk that we are enabling travelers to find our content without visiting TripAdvisor, but I'd argue it has worked stunningly well for the past 15 years. Hard to prove, but I don't know why our current API/program would change the successful dynamics of the past decade. "Speed Wins": Speed wins is an important cultural aspect to this company. It means that we value going fast, rather than long strategy planning sessions, bi-annual product roadmap sessions, and other hallmarks of big, slow companies. Speed wins does NOT mean we ship crap code, or ignore what users want in the name of 'going fast', or any of the myriad of ways that phrase can be misused or misunderstood. I subscribe to the 'done is better than perfect' mantra, which irks some, and worse, is sometimes used as an excuse to ship something that embarrasses us. We've made mistakes, of course, and I've publicly acknowledged that we have some technical debt to take care of... but we are making good progress. I'd love to hear your thoughts/suggestions on how I can better communicate these values to everyone in our company. I'm sure you aren't a fan of 'slow and perfect' as a motto, so better communication of "Speed Wins" is even more important at 3000 people than 30 people. Culture is important, and this is one of my most important challenges as we grow... how to instill/maintain a sense of 'what does the traveler want', and 'how can we always press ourselves to deliver what they want, faster, more efficiently, with high quality.' As you likely know, we are actively working on the “culture question” at the organizational level, making sure that we have clear, well-understood values and supporting professional development opportunities, as I also recognize its importance. Product Direction: Where does our product roadmap come from? It certainly does come from what our users want, but we also try to forecast what they will want in the future. We don't always get it right, but we try. We're happy to copy ideas from other sites, buy companies that have done something well and integrate it into our product, and invent new functionality. Quality control of the PM's: We have a weekly product review meeting, which is open to the company. I think that is great. It’s an open meeting, so anyone who wants to learn what we are planning on can attend. It is meant as a communication forum, where a product manager can present what they plan to build, and all potential interest stakeholders can ask questions, comment, or simply nod in approval. It is quite efficient in that goal. Please don't view it as "quality control", as that is not the purpose. The fact that this meeting is weekly is also something we are proud of... we do a lot each week. Lots of small projects, some large. My micromanaging ways: True enough, I have some micromanaging habits. Some I feel are justified, some I need to change as the company continues to grow. I care a lot about the people in the company, and how we run as an organization, so I like to be involved in many aspects of the business. I used to not only approve job openings across the company, I used to interview every single new hire (in the final round). I really want to hire the best. That didn't scale, and I stopped interviewing everyone. I do approve open requisitions, because I am interested in knowing where our headcount is growing, and how we are resourcing against our most important priorities. That said, I try hard not to be a bottleneck in the hiring process. I also care a lot about the product and the technology. I use our products daily, and express my opinions and file bugs. Why? Because I want to contribute in as many ways as I can to make our product better. Is that scalable? Nope. But I do it anyways because I care. Some interpret that as micromanaging, but I view it as a positive. Finally, I am a believer that the best companies are the ones that move fast and are the quickest to adapt. While our business is very healthy, we continue to 'reinvent ourselves' each year to be better for our travelers, better for our clients, and better for our employees. Steve

Explore other reviews about Tripadvisor

5.0
18 Jan 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

people are awesome remote work is common pay and benefits are good

Cons

can they stay relevant in the world of AI

1
avatar
Tripadvisor Response
4mo
Thank you for your positive remarks. As our company continues to evolve, we are appreciative of employee comments that highlight our strengths as well as areas we can improve upon.
2.0
21 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people you get to work with are genuinely great, and the work-life balance remains fairly solid. In the past, the company attracted top-tier engineering talent from the most reputable tech firms, and the expectations were high but rewarding. A lot of that collaborative culture still exists among the engineers. You will be surrounded by capable individuals who want to do good work.

Cons

The company has been battered by unresolved structural issues over the last decade. The core meta-search business was crippled when Google altered its algorithms to prioritize its own travel products, effectively choking off the organic traffic Tripadvisor depended on. Combined with the impact of COVID-19, leadership tried launching new products to escape this SEO reliance, but those attempts consistently missed the mark. Now, the rapid adoption of LLMs is delivering another severe blow. Users no longer need traditional meta-search to plan travel. The core Tripadvisor product has essentially become a legacy cash cow, with the Experiences division (Viator) being the primary engine keeping the business afloat. Following the departure of the former CEO, thousands of highly skilled employees have left through attrition or ongoing restructuring. Layoffs have become a grim constant, happening once or twice a year. Even if you manage to avoid the cuts, the compensation structure is no longer competitive for the tech industry, and RSUs have virtually dried up. Because of the abysmal direction and the very high chance you won't survive the next round of looming layoffs, I strongly recommend avoiding this company as a new hire.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All