RWDI Reviews

Pros

High Profile Projects. Technical excellence in certain departments. If you stick around and accept crappy wages for 10 years you will learn from the technical leaders, if they are still around. Great benefits package - Management loves to justify low wages for this Don't force you to work late - but you won't be compensated fairly if you 'only' work 8 hour days Business is steady - they're the go-to wind experts.

Cons

Not necessarily selective in the projects they accept (environmental impact, human rights record of government they are working for, etc). Mostly care about the $. They have an outdated employee management system. Have openly heard multiple leaders say if you don't like it you can leave. Pride themselves in paying juniors below market wages. Employee reviews are done using a matrix rather than speaking to people you work with. There's a big lack of diversity in the senior leadership team and that shows in the way they treat staff.

Pros

There is no end to brilliant co-workers. there is no end to high profile interesting projects.

Cons

There is no end to dysfunctional leadership. There is no end to change of direction. The company has lost itself while trying to expand into every corner it can find. Putting people under constant pressure does not lead to the highest quality nor highest quantity. it just leads to trouble. The compensation is at best approaching below median.

Pros

Great Work / Life balance is provided here.

Cons

Employees aren't paid higher than the median salary.

Pros

Vacation time, gym stipend, small education stipend, sustainability projects

Cons

Psychological harassment. Qualified Leadership. Ability to cross platforms or move up. Raise structure is based on personal discretion and not based on merit.

Pros

Interesting projects. The work was never boring. There was also the flexibility to work at home occasionally.

Cons

Reviewers of technical documents would frequently request conflicting information. Most interactions with PMs or other analysts required scheduled meetings or were done only by email, when a quick talk with someone a cubical over or a project team meeting would be more efficient.