Join as a fresher, Leave this company counting exactly 730 days from joining - Test Engineer Infosys Employee Review

2.0
30 June 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good for freshers. Excellent training Most of the managers I worked with were OK

Cons

Hypocrisy at root level. They call it a family to get extra from employees Policy at high level : Each year, one employee un-friendly policy [last 3 years: irace, no hike, change in certification structure] : Experienced employees either leave or work without benefits. [Passive firing] Take freshers to fill in [Difference in pay is the advantage] Project them as experienced guys to clients. Make them toil at around 12-14 hours a day. Pay them for 8 or 9 hours. Employee NEVER gets to decide his work stream [Don't believe what they say during training] Underpays [worst in indutrsy]. Policies put managers at bad light in front of the employees who report to them [I am not a manager]

Explore other reviews about Infosys

5.0
15 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Its a good company to work and grow in your IT career.

Cons

I did not see any issues while working with the company

4.0
10 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Cons

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All