Is the brand name starting to fade - Software Engineer Infosys Employee Review

3.0
5 Nov 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

One reason that most infy employees will agree with me is here, is its brand name. Which I think has started to fade in the recent days. It's a company of good ethics and values. The infrastructure and the effort taken for the maintenance is really amazing.

Cons

There's a good ambience to sit and work here, but not to grow. While ET and other major financial experts report infy's growth in revenue quarter by quarter, sal hikes and promotions dont reflect that. Very poor in employee care when compared to similar employees. The people working in out of the city development centers will strongly approve my opinion on this, the travel costs and appalling penalties being the reason. It has turned out to be, a normal, yet another IT company with its own politics and dissatsified employees whose number is recently increasing. Recommended only for laterals that too only for managerial roles.

Explore other reviews about Infosys

5.0
4 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great salary, great people. LEX internal library is great.

Cons

Can not think of any cons.

4.0
10 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Cons

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All